Police Power and Protests - Nina Power Lindsey German Counterfire South London 08.12.11

www.counterfire.org

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Police
• Power
• and
• Protests
• Nina
• Lindsey
• German
• Counterfire
• South
• London

[19loch]

Great discussion, this is what is missing from ‘mainstream TV’ thanks for this post. This platform of information/discussion needs to be promulgated to the country to give a balance of what is actually occurring as opposed to what ‘spin docs’ provides to media.

[19loch]

Our "leaders" have failed us badly, we are not becoming, we are a police state of revenue collectors and bullies, thugs and criminal gangs operating in uniform who are just following orders to protect politicians corporate greed ,the police need to be changed and realise who and what they are when the uniform is not worn

[elevatwell]

exclusion as the form of surveillance.

[elevatwell]

because me i tell you something, i am not gonna get ready to live under occupation.

[elevatwell]

Could we stay private and enforce transparency as for damages are concerned. Or the object of corner, concern as damages is the dam of ages. And don’t touch to my pushy cat.

who do you want adhere, if it is not this exact rue rule threatened by OTHERs if you don't work at establishing freedom, bridges, and barriers.

[elevatwell]

Whci ch rules or manifest for privacy. Privacy then without private property within the common spaces?

As private ownership permit sovereignty and free appreciation, where would be the island if under a all commonspaces where privacy and individual freedom, and individualization or particularization (but not particularism) (and why not free like an atom- em {aim} ota (iota){hot or remove in french} d be under assassination,

Atone

[elevatwell]

also not taking into account in the discourse of social is the nature of man, man centred though, without its universe, without being united and talkde in term of dissensiton, its shadow or absence, death, emptiness and impertience.

solidarity or liquidity.???

[elevatwell]

Mclellan, d. (1990) because basically everyone is talking about the social over which they theorized as good sheep and never about economy, main concern of marx prevailing over the politics as the latter being dependend of the former.

the weapon of criticism cannot, of course, supplant the criticism of weapons.

weep. marx.

[elevatwell]

a society of pure morality, to produce in knowing that our means of production are depletion will ensure a culture and mentality of seduction, adduction, addiction, destruction and immorality. Whate veer would be the rules they would be eviction, viciated . about priviledge and for distortion theft tacit threat and felons.

[elevatwell]

would be solidarising long in case of a ‘prisoner dilemma context.

As and it is what I reproach you, the solidarity,that no one is taking the subject of communism, and in fact you are not communist by any means but social liquidity, is about the resources. You can have any rules of equity and justice, jury, fair trial, constitution, diplomacy, whatever filing and field of theorization if there is no more resources, only if we would have been brought up and self build up

[elevatwell]

They are groups assemble on some unofficial occasion, they are fluids and then unleash from debates, yes but also from results and work and cohesion- as well as responsibilisat ion.

In addition, they are groups under who? Lead by who, yes but crush or supervise or block by who?

It d be interesting to know in front o fthe police, the power holder, the police of anywhere, none immune against becoming the Gestapo,