Nate Prosser vs Derek Dorsett Feb 7, 2012

Nate Prosser vs Derek Dorsett from the Minnesota Wild at Columbus Blue Jackets game on Feb 7, 2012.
via http://www.hockeyfights.com

• Category

  Sports

[leafkillz]

Win Dorsett

[SpudHawg]

Yup. And not only did Dorsett stand there and wait for Prosser to take off his helmet, Dorsett even stood there and waited while Prosser pulled Dorsett's helmet off! As soon as Prosser dropped Dorsett's helmet though, Dorsett came down on him like a ton of bricks.

[abi howlett]

Prosser went looking for the fight and Dorsett just put him in check. Prosser didn't have to take off his helmet or Dorsetts for that matter. From the fight between Derek Dorsett and Taylor Hall its kind of obvious that Dorsett doesn't care if you wear a shield or not he will still fight you.

[FabolousNupe]

Thug animals

[RyanPenn22]

Dorsett will go toe to toe with anyone, and probably win.

[Teabagonyou]

Telegram...tie up the right hand!!!

[delacroixwalrus]

If Dorsett really wanted to fight Prosser, why did he wait until Prosser took off his own helmet before doing anything?

Prosser showed uncommon honor and class in this fight. Do not try to undermine that. For every player like Prosser, there are 20 more who start fights while wearing their visors and blindsiding other players.

I would love to see someone win a fight because they beat the other one down, not because they slipped and yanked on the other's jersey.

[Travis Moore]

sr016ify, watch dorsetts fights, he fights fighters all the time and beats them. You are dumb

[MrMartiniHockey]

Oh, and the ONLY REASON Prosser took off his helmet is because he wears a visor and knew he would risk getting an instigator penalty. Let's not praise his "class" too much, folks.