Projecting Future Climate Change, with Steve Schneider
Top Comments
All Comments (25)
-
@FloxByTe then prove it cant trap heat.
-
@michalslahor okay kord monckton has been debunked prove his point wrong gas trapping heat.
-
Just type in Lord Moncton, and find out for yourself. Or the hacked e-mails from the IPCC scientists climate gate, or Jesse Ventura Climate Change on youtube
or Michael Crichton's State of Fear. The evidence is now in, climate change is Rothschild global elite scam to tax us for breathing. Co2 is the building block of life, it makes plants grow, plants make oxygen, if it gets warmer then more plants up North, eating co2 for o2, the science is wrong.
-
This man is not giving the real facts, read Eaarth by Bill McKibben. Climate Change is not a threat, it is a reality. It is in effect, now. It will not only create disaster for the developing countries, all beings over the globe WILL SUFFER...it is just a matter to what degree. At the rate we are going, there will be no 2050.
-
Climate has been warming since Napoleon's time - well before ANYONE claims CO2 from human activity would have played a part. This is not unnatural at all. IPCC has already got egg on its face. The politicised climate activists make up their data. The rest of us are well aware of the proven evidence.
"Science .... commits suicide when it adopts a creed" - T.Huxley.
Schneider is just another preacher of a new religion.
-
Climate change deniers havent looked at the evidence.
-
RIP to the Great Climate Change in the sky!
-
Wow, is this guy on PCP and GHB? Or just acid and AIDS. Better yet he is a well paid lackey. BULLSHIT climate change lies!
-
for the most part both happen at the same time, the rise co2 in contributes to the rest of warming after the first part has already begun



What is sad about this is that people would rather discuss some bimbo's latest 'terview, hairdo or but nakedness for some red carpet, that worry about this horror scenario being true.
And it is.
Law? There should be one, one that protects Earth against the greedy, the ignorant, the selfish and the dumb.
Alekkkkkkkkk 2 years ago 3
@michalslahor Just shouting "Is too!" and "Is not!" doesn't make for a very informed debate. Even a position that's utterly true requires a dissenting viewpoint in order to test its truth and keep it from slipping into the realm of dead dogma, so your dissenting viewpoint would of course be valuable; but "BULLSHIT" is not much of a rebuttal. Can you elaborate without resorting to name calling and ridicule?
shadezofgrayfulness 1 year ago