EEVblog #23 - GSM mobile phone audio design
Uploader Comments (EEVblog)
Top Comments
-
Hello Dave! Just wanted to let you know how much I enjoy watching your videos and really appreciate the educational value in them. Found your eevblog from hackaday.
Keep up the great work and thanks!
All Comments (23)
-
"youre screwed in all sorts of ways" hahaha
-
So phones in other parts of the world make the same sounding interference? I may be sounding stupid here, but I'm absolutely serious here, I thought just cellphones in England did that, since I've never heard it until now on any videos outside of England.
-
Don't other technologies do that as well (not just GSM)? I thought phones on Verizon's network did that too.
-
I was really getting into troubleshooting the problem there, and then his solution turned out to be a commercial solution. I've got to say I was a bit disappointed. It feels like I've just been told, "Leave it to the real engineers." I didn't learn anything here that I couldn't have gotten from a Maxim ad.
What about putting the whole audio part in some kind of metal shield? That's what I did when one of my stereos kept picking that noise up.
CoolDudeClem 4 months ago
@CoolDudeClem That doesn't help much, you can get pickup on the input and output and power leads.
EEVblog 4 months ago
If RF can inject itself on the Output going to the headphones, how would a radiation immune IC prevent that? Wouldn't you still need the RF Traps (33pf | 10pf) at the output?
Also, in the beginning, you mention 217Hz is the frequency to watch out for, but in the end, your traps are only for the 800/900/1800Mhz? Where did 217Hz factor in?
enliteneer 9 months ago
@enliteneer The RF pulses are at 217Hz spacing.
EEVblog 9 months ago
I was really getting into troubleshooting the problem there, and then his solution turned out to be a commercial solution. I've got to say I was a bit disappointed. It feels like I've just been told, "Leave it to the real engineers." I didn't learn anything here that I couldn't have gotten from a Maxim ad.
Also, word on the street is dead-bugging chips leaves the IC itself more vulnerable to RF interference. Just sayin'.
dingobabystealer 1 year ago
@dingobabystealer No, it's an example of how some things are sometimes just better solved with an already optimised COTS solution. We could have dicked around for a few more weeks or months (if we had the time) and possibly came up with a discrete solution, but that didn't fit into our requirements.
Many people learned a lot from this video, so that's good enough for me.
EEVblog 1 year ago