1969 Dodge Charger run against 2004 STI
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (139)
-
does the sti have a short ram intake
-
@skaterboyryan89 Mate, I have a 1968 SS396 camaro with 450hp AND a 2006 STI with 400Hp. The camaro is tuffer, but the STI is much faster: launch, acceleration (rolling is similar), top end, cornering, braking all far superior. Love old musclecars (including mopars), but don't kid yourself, they are no match for modern technology.
-
Really? Chargers aren't that fast in today's terms. The STI is AWD and got a decent launch. It's also 1000+lbs lighter and isn't that short in HP either.
-
@14alexjb no its a 69 with a 68 grille
-
@dukeboy1998 No its a 69 with a 68 grille
-
granny shifting on both vehicles... but still, its a 4 wheel whos main purpose is a turbo charged off road vehicle vs a real wheel muscle car.... my vote goes to neither although i wouldve prefered the charger since im all about american muscle
-
I'll take on the winner in my Prius! :-))
-
thats a 68
-
Not to be a smartass but thats a 68 charger
-
remove the music and then this video is good :D
If an STI runs beats a Charger, I would have to seriously question the skills of the driver in the Charger.
skaterboyryan89 9 months ago 10
the driver of the sti needs to learn how to launch and shift.
nationjanes 11 months ago 9