Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Roadfly.com - 2008 Subaru Outback 2.5 XT

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
104,620
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 4, 2007

Video car review of the brand new 2008 Subaru Outback 2.5 XT.

For car reviews, videos, and one of the oldest and largest car communities on the Internet visit Roadfly.com http://www.roadfly.com

Follow us on Facebook! http://www.facebook.com/roadfly

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 7 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • My 2000 Outback has 270,000 miles on it and it still runs great! :)

  • amazingly, the outback was one of the top 10 most likely cars to be ticketed. Why, I have no clue.

see all

All Comments (92)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @PeninsulaBoy217

    Bullshit.

  • @PeninsulaBoy217 Is it a 4 or 6 cylinder engine?

  • @Captainskier

    that's nothing for a subaru, even for a turbocharged one. my outback has 219,000 miles on it and it's started up every single day I've owned it. the stock clutch lasted until 205,000 miles!!!

  • @Bufbarnaby -- what's your price?

  • @Captainskier I have a 2006 with brand new engine , clutch , turbo with only 80K miles and is like new.

    Engine still under warranty. Rare 5-speed manual. Make me an offer.

  • @normalais yeah? quote one. It's hard to compare the too, but scrubbing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere isn't that hard. Repairing destroyed ecosystems is vastly difficult. Saying they pollute "less" is sort of naive; there is no "unit" of pollution, only relativity. Polluting the air is relatively less damaging than polluting/destroying land, ground water, and life.

  • @eskimo810 They pollute considerably less. That's been proven in a number of studies already.

  • @normalais not really. they just pollute in a different way. The environmental impact and soil degradation caused by the mining of nickel and other heavy metals used in batteries is entirely comparable to the greenhouse gases and particulate matter generated by combustion.

  • @eskimo810 nope, they're much better than burning fossill fuels

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more