Anti Animal Testing (RO)

ANTI ANIMAL TESTING

Category:

Pets & Animals

Tags:

• anti
• animal
• testing
• RO
• dogs
• cats
• monkeys
• sad
• sorrow
• cry

[hamstersteddy127]

@imafreak123bob Sadness and sorrow by naruto the show

[cristina92rusu]

atata cruzime pe lumea asta si ne mai numim oameni..Refuz sa cred ca un OM ar putea sa chinuie in asemenea hal niste biete animalute care nu le-au facut nimic..doar pentru niste produse:| doamne si culmea idioteniei este ca niciodata nu m-am gandit la asta.. cum pot stii cand un produs este testat pe animale?..Va rog sa imi spuna si mie cineva pentru ca nu vreau sa moara niste animalute inocente ca sa am eu fond de ten..

[PRHILL9696]

with all the human trash that should be used we instead harm poor innocent lives!

[imafreak123bob]

song??

[theraviolicat2]

The Final Solution: Every asshole who does this needs to be made to watch this done to his/her kids and forced to participate. While this is ocurring they should be housed as they have housed the animals they tortured.. They will be told from the start that as soon as their last remaining loved one is dead that they will go through the process themselves. This should be done to everyone and their family members who profit from this. Exterminate the people doing this and their offspring.

[SuperKare123]

@cadbrycreamegg Idk- But you can see in the back of the can and if it has 'This product not tested on animals', than no. But if it doesn't say anything than yes it's tested on animals.

[cadbrycreamegg]

@SuperKare123 What about swarcksscoph or whatever i dont know how to spell it but i use their spray on conditioner for my frizzy drie hair, it works wonders!

[noratmedicine]

# "The results of these (animal) tests cannot be used to predict toxicity or to guide therapy in human exposure."

(Christopher D. Smith, M.D., Longbeach, California.)

# "The data produced by these tests don't keep harmful products from being sold."

(Ellen Michael, M.D., Beverley Shores, Indiana.)

[noratmedicine]

@croydonkidd1 According to the US FDA 92% of new drugs fail in clinical trials, after they have passed all the safety tests in animals. US FDA (2004) "Innovation or Stagnation, Challenge and Opportunity on the Critical Path to new Medical Products" So we would ceertainly be better off without the animal 'test' which is a legal not a scientific tool. non animal drug tests are actually safer for humans see curedisease. net of drugtestingconference. com

[noratmedicine]

"After intensive study of the issue, I am convinced that the Draize eye irritancy and the Lethal Dose 50 tests are inaccurate, unreliable, costly and cruel to the animals. The tests deceive the very consumers whom they are supposed to protect, by certifying as SAFE household products and cosmetics that cause two hundred thousand hospital-recorded poisonous exposures annually."

(Paula Kislak, D.V.M., Sherman Oaks, California.)

curedisease. net