Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Joseph Stiglitz Lambastes Obama Stimulus

Complete video at: http://fora.tv/2009/02/19/S... Economist Joseph Stiglitz argues that the Obama stimulus package was "badly designed and not enough." Comparing the current recession to the Great...  
 
Customize

More From: ForaTv

Joseph Stiglitz - Bail Out Homeowners, Not Banks2:43
4,412 views
Paul Krugman - Income Inequality and the Middle Class7:14
44,307 views
Joseph Stiglitz - Will the Economic Stimulus Package Work?2:53
5,308 views
Was Iraq Worth It? - General Jack Keane2:06
1,624 views
Joseph Stiglitz - Sharing the Benefits of Globalization4:45
15,027 views
Joseph Stiglitz: Bad Bank is 'Cash for Trash'7:03
4,238 views
Henry Kissinger - China as a Rising Power3:14
39,717 views
Naomi Klein Blames Greenspan, Deregulation for Economic Crisis2:32
5,457 views
Paul Krugman Supports Stimulus, Warns No Quick Fix4:33
2,322 views
Aspiring Billionaire? Ted Turner Advocates Clean Energy1:55
1,527 views
How Does a Warming Arctic Affect Global Climate? - Susan Hassol4:07
1,335 views
Time for a New Women's Movement? - Ruth Reichl1:55
996 views
Does Losing GM Matter? - William Holstein2:36
897 views
Does Affirmative Action Stigmatize Students? - Julian Bond and Dalton Conley2:28
2,960 views
Pelosi Calls for Investigation of Economic Crisis2:58
1,217 views
Joseph Stiglitz - Problems with GDP as an Economic Barometer8:06
31,087 views
Noam Chomsky: Big Business Dictates the Presidency4:12
9,522 views
Wafa Sultan: Islam Is Incompatible with Western Law1:57
303 views
How Did Early Humans Survive Climate Change? - Sander van der Leeuw2:25
325 views
Sports, Sex, Scandals, Weather: How News Media Competes5:01
1,489 views

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
57 ratings
Sign in to rate
3,490 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (50)   Options

Loading...
shahen13 (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
okay, here is a starting point - go look up the year of the biggest growth in US GDP and then figure out why it happened. When you have done that, we can have an intelligent discussion - primarily because you will actually be speaking with knowledge at that point.
reefpirate (5 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Well, I can only find data as far back as 1947 right now, so why don't you tell me what it is.

Since 1947, it was 2008 that had the biggest spike. But remember that GDP is a nominal value, whereby if you have more dollars in an economy it will be larger, not necessarily more wealthy. Also, GDP unfortunately usually includes government spending which doesn't do much to represent prosperity, but rather represents a larger burden on society.

Just make your point already, enlightened one.
shahen13 (5 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
It's 1942 - 19% growth because of government spending for WWII. Ever hear how wars are good for an economy? They are actually talking govt spending when they say that.
GDP, incidentally, is reported in nominal as well as real terms. And perhaps you are not fully aware of how govt spending works but consider that you are a contractor and the govt hires you to build roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, etc. If the govt. "spends" $1 million on that project - that is $1 million in income for you.
shahen13 (5 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
That actually does indeed represent prosperity for you as a member of that economy - regardless of whatever your "economic guru" might be telling you. Now that also represents govt debt - no questions. However, during a recession if the governmnent does not step up and spend more creating income for individuals, who will? Businesses are too scared in a recession and so are consumers. The govt. IS THE ONLY CHOICE when times are tough. During good times, the govt. needs to get out of the way.
shahen13 (5 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
You are confused in your analysis because you do not make the distinction between good times and bad. It makes all the difference.
Read a couple of serious books on macroeconomics and learn something before you form strong opinions.
reefpirate (5 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Don't worry, my opinions are still forming.

The problem with the $1 million dollars I earn from a government contract is that money has to come from elsewhere in the economy. It's like taking a bucket of water from the deep end of a pool and pouring it in the shallow end.

WWII was followed by a sharp recession. War is bad for the economy, and good for certain profiteers. War could also be good for unemployment if there is a draft. But that is not real employment, not the kind we want.
reefpirate (5 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Also, if government spending is so beneficial during a downturn, why did the Depression last for more than a decade despite all the government spending and contracts being handed out? I think, from what I can tell, that the Depression was prolonged by Roosevelt not prevented by him. He didn't prevent anything. In fact, the Depression didn't end until after he was dead. Now if this is the course you want to take now, 10 years of a terrible economy, fine go ahead and support the stimulus measures.
shahen13 (4 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I suggest you study the great depression in greater detail since you have the facts all wrong on it. I am afraid that I cannot spend much more time on chatting with you. Good luck and get a solid education - it will really help you with your future.
reefpirate (1 day ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Ok, I hope that wasn't a simple way of dodging the question: Why did the Great Depression last for more than a decade (it wasn't really over until after the war) even with all the government spending? Is this the type of history we should repeat? Throw money at our problems, and hope they go away? And if the don't, do we just throw more at em until we hit World War III? Sounds like bad advice to me.
shahen13 (1 day ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Look up the fact that Hoover was President until 1933 and only after him did Roosevelt take over. Then look up the duration of the Great Depression. After you have done that, look up the vastly different economic policies implemented by the two Presidents and what impact they had. When you are done with that - look up "Hooverville." And when you are done with that, come back and I will gladly answer all your questions.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.