Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Re: Famous Athiest Antony Flew Changes Mind, Believes in God

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
41,726
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 8, 2007

Richard Dawkins talks about Antony Flew.
http://www.secweb.org/index.aspx?action=viewAsset&id=369

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 121 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,463)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • no offense but after reading The God Delusion, I have a hard time taking any of Dawkins opinions seriously.

  • Dawkins is sooo classy! (sarcasm)

  • This wasn't very well articulated but the comments that seem very anti-atheism are not really any better

    I can see why Antony Flew arrived at his conclusion and don't think this disqualifies him from being a great philosopher. However it is still illogical to assert that the universe is intelligently designed. After all, if eternity is impossible within our universe then any force outside would not be eternal either. An eternal force could have no logical reason to create a finite universe

  • Give up Dawkins.

  • oh please Dawkins did you even read Antony Flew's last book? It was way better than your logically fallacious one. Stop smearing and lying.

  • People still listen to this idiot's (dawkins) comments? He's not smarter than any of you, he's not wise, he's self centered and lacking wisdom. He's got arrogance and ego in abundance though. Why do people even bother with him?

    But wait, the richest and most powerful people (not talking about fools like buffet) on this earth DO believe in Satan and God. How does Dawkins stand in that regard? These people fund his pointless work. Strange isn't it? Makes you think critically doesn't it?

  • whats very sad is someone claims to be wise says if someone believes in a creator they are from that point on stupid. this is hate hes preaching,discrimination,and ignorance on his part.think about it, ON C-SPAN?they want no God because with no God means no morals.do what thou wilt,ring a bell?i spit on richard and his satanic realm of propaganda.

  • We will all find out soon enough. But anyone why uses the argument " ha ha looser" I suspect might be in for a rude shock.

  • HAHA LOSERRRRR!

    give it up and admit that you're wrong already. silly silly man. YOU are the "sad" one.

  • @nacho2354 Nice quote mining on your part. The term 'was' had to do with the fact that he wasn't a practicing academic philosopher any longer; he wasn't taking about the mans intellect. Yikes...

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more