Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

U.S. Constitution 4th Amendment is Dead in America

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
243,436
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 21, 2007

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment04/

Some dumb Indiana Sheriff sits back and does absolutely nothing while an even dumber health inspector trespasses on private property without a warrant. I hope both these people got fired because this guy couldnt be more correct about his constitutional rights to privacy. Smart of him to get it all on film.
_____________________________
Laporte County Health Dept
Julie Wolfe
809 State St. Suite 401A Laporte, In 46350
(219)326-6808 ext 200.
Fax (219)325-8628

DEPUTY CADE COOPER
SERVING SINCE 2004
Address: 809 State Street Suite 202A
LaPorte, Indiana 46350
Phone LaPorte Office Number: 219-326-7700
_________________________________________
Amendment IV (the Fourth Amendment) to the United States Constitution is one of the provisions included in the Bill of Rights. The Amendment guards against unreasonable searches and seizures, and was originally designed as a response to the controversial writs of assistance (a type of general search warrant), which were a significant factor behind the American Revolution. Toward that end, the amendment specifies that judicially sanctioned search and arrest warrants must be supported by probable cause and be limited in scope according to specific information supplied by a person (usually a peace officer) who has sworn by it and is therefore accountable to the issuing court.

The amendment applies only to governmental actors; it does not guarantee to people the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures conducted by private citizens or organizations. The Bill of Rights only restricts the power of the federal government, but the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that the Fourth Amendment is applicable to state governments by operation of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court has said that some searches and seizures may violate the Fourth Amendment's reasonableness requirement even if a warrant is supported by probable cause and is limited in scope. Conversely, the Court has approved routine warrantless seizures, for example "where there is probable cause to believe that a criminal offense has been or is being committed."

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 72 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @heymisterderp said, "Well then take trivial and useless which is the explanation for why it's irrelevant to this video".

    Thanks for confirming that your original claims about what Katz protects are trivial and useless.

  • @heymisterderp lol...well, i and david (and pafoonik too) allegedly have a 'two year addiction' but you have a week old addiction which, per your logic, is no better.

    i noticed the times you posted...10 hours ago, 9 hours ago, 5 hours ago. you gonna get some sleep?

    and spamming me and david...for shame. pafoonik saw that too. i noticed that for all your interest in this topic, you spammed us. how sad. don't want those dissenting points of view?

see all

All Comments (12,008)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • yeah freedom my ass ameshitca.

  • @po11utedmind: Yes, you can sue both people and departments. But if you had gotten your gun and threatened her, you would have no doubt have found out why the deputy was there.

    Please realize that she did not violate his 4th Amendment rights, and MAY have had authority to enter under Indiana Code 16-20-1-23 (if she gave due notice).

  • I believe you can sue both people and departments. If it was me, if the police did not do their job... stand by and let a crime happen on tape?! I would have got my gun!

  • @Wrayn2002: Since the 4th Amendment only protects "persons, houses, papers, and effects" and she searched none of those, she did not violate his 4th Amendment rights, and state law applies. Indiana Code 16-20-1-23 allows health inspectors to enter private property to investigate disease, after due notice. We don't know whether she gave due notice, so we don't know whether she trespassed.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more