@MeanTerminator i totally disagree with you. Brahms was never a fast playing pianist. Speed is NEVER essential on Brahms music but rather the orchestral sound. This tempo could be good if the pianist would have time to breath and to phrase properly which he obvisouly doesn't...
your words are ugly! no idea what makes true understanding of different styles or ways of playing.just fast and confused comment, all negative , no positive,no respect , no thinking before writing.actually i am saying you should write at least a more friendly comment.not just as if you want to scold him musically very ugly?? why not say he is technically very good?
Musically very ugly! No idea what makes true impact, whether in brilliance or poetry. Just fast confused notes, all compacted, no breathing, no light, no shade, no interest.
@MeanTerminator i totally disagree with you. Brahms was never a fast playing pianist. Speed is NEVER essential on Brahms music but rather the orchestral sound. This tempo could be good if the pianist would have time to breath and to phrase properly which he obvisouly doesn't...
Masmorra84 1 year ago
unsauber....zu schnell? trotzdem Wahnsinn, das zu spielen
Querfahrer69 1 year ago
....wow....
megadetroyer100 1 year ago
The best Brahms/Paganini variation I have heard so far, next only to the one by Sergio Fiorentino, and I have heard quite a few.
Speed is of the essence to bring out the essence of this piece. Anything slower than this would be a slow motion sloppy disaster.
MeanTerminator 2 years ago
This is a great pianist
pastafantastica 2 years ago
lols.ok.i am just bored so i simply put comment.i have a very horrible mood that day.sorry.^^
danielchong1234 2 years ago
Because technically it is very deficient, as well as musically.
NOSEhow2LIV 2 years ago
your words are ugly! no idea what makes true understanding of different styles or ways of playing.just fast and confused comment, all negative , no positive,no respect , no thinking before writing.actually i am saying you should write at least a more friendly comment.not just as if you want to scold him musically very ugly?? why not say he is technically very good?
danielchong1234 2 years ago
Hi, wo war das?
Der spielt echt gut!
fotographin 2 years ago
Musically very ugly! No idea what makes true impact, whether in brilliance or poetry. Just fast confused notes, all compacted, no breathing, no light, no shade, no interest.
NOSEhow2LIV 2 years ago 2