Randi Rhodes on Dan Abrams 10-08-07 P2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
7,665
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 8, 2007

Randi Rhodes with Pat Buchanan and Adams Smith on MSNBC's LIVE with Dan Abrams. They discuss Iran/Iraq and Torture.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Notice that here, as always, none of the right wingers who posted here had anything to say about the subject. They personally attack Ms. Rhodes because they don't even really understand the subject. Republicans are always a day late and a dollar short.

  • hey TOPCOWARD... like the idiot U are...What made U believe I was a Man in the first place? Stupid! lol...and by the way...I was not the one who believed bush's lies about WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTIONS, it was U..the IDIOT! LOL, So U should be serving in Iraq for Your beloved LYING BUSH. Get it.

see all

All Comments (33)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Don't you miss the Bush years!

    What a joke of a man to represent this great country.

  • TYVM loon.

  • thats outstanding. i literaly can not tell if your kidding or not. LOL

  • Spoken like a true moonbat.

  • those LIARS....so glad they are gone and hope they come back for war crimes prosecutions and sentencings

  • If we were more honest about how horrible war really is, perhaps we wouldn't jump into it so easily/willingly. But the real problem is that those in charge, who control us and run our government, want war. There would be less war if countries were more open and upfront about it, because their people wouldn't want it/tolerate it. Remember the whole reason for the U.N. existing is because the world was tired of war after going through 2 World Wars in their lifetime. But as usual it's all B.S.

  • then we need to just do it and stop whining about it. I guess that is the real question, whether or not it is necessary. If it is necessary... then they need to say: hey look just shut the fuck up this is war and in war there can't/ shouldn't be rules otherwise it isn't really war. You can't cry hey that's not fair that's against the rules in a war. The very idea of having rules in war is ridiculous and undermines the whole idea of war. It makes war seems less serious then it really is. Maybe...

  • the worst thing we can do is, to do it and lie about doing it. That is hypocritical and will only cause more hatred against this country by other countries. Whereas if we didn't we would show our moral superiority and would be admirable to other countries. Especially if we were successful in spite of not taking those drastic measures. We might inspire other nations to change. However if we can't be successful without resorting to those tactics...

  • Judging from his question at the end it is obvious that Pat Robertson believes that, the end justifies the means. Pretty dangerous thing to say. That is a very slippery slope and i can't believe no one called him on it. We as a country need to make our minds up about the issue, it can't be conditional like with what if comments. Either we take the moral high ground (set an example) and don't torture. Or we join our enemies in the dangerous waters and act just as badly as they do. But...

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more