Battle of Stamford Bridge (Ch. 4: 1066) Part 2/3
Top Comments
All Comments (162)
-
YOU SHALL NOT PASS!!
-
Cowardice? I would have done the same. I in his place, I'd think it be pretty stupid for my countrymen to die at the hands of one bloke. Its not only stupid but it damages morale, and its also an utter waste of lives. If an out of nowhere spear in the anus takes for this dumbfuckery to stop, Id do so.
-
@logik316 idk why the english general couldn't fight him he was the best among them but i do agree all is fair in love and war so i would have done the same thing why bang your head at a wall when its only two feet to go around
-
in war much more was won by stealth than by champions, then and now
-
This wasn't a duel. In trial by combat (where one man wished to settle a personal grievance against another man) there were rules and judges to keep the fight fair. But in mass warfare the Saxons and Vikings alike just did whatever they could to win, and chivalry wasn't a consideration until much later in history.
-
Tbh, I'd be on the Anglo-Saxon side, but that was really cowardly to sneak behind him like that.
-
電影都是幻想的
cowardice on the part of the English... sneaking up on an honorable warrior such as that? was there no one among them brave enough to go against him that didnt already die?
knight19283 1 year ago 24
I AM TO KEEP THIS BRIDGE!
IcyViking 5 months ago 11