Top Comments
All Comments (264)
-
I guess you could say
*sunglasses*
They really were SHOOTING STARS
yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
h -
@AnnatarYoung what has that got to do with this video?
-
@shibzy0tennant his he's accent funneh?
-
Guess that's true guys... Oh well :)
-
@Fireodeath BBC Worldwide mate, it's the profitable arm of the BBC.
-
@catbat06 And also as the license fee would increase if it had to encompass youtube as well. I think a few seconds of advertising is better than that...
-
@Fireodeath oh, and also, bbc worldwide is the commercial arm of the bbc which earns money through means other than the license fee. So that's another reason.
-
@Fireodeath because youtube isn't owned by bbc. iplayer, which is, has no ads.
-
@dangitcarn I don't think it's possible to restrict ads on YouTube to only appear in certain countries, besides if they want to make money they can, it's only an advertisement.
-
@DarrelHerring But TV licence money funds the BBC. Hence why they have no advertising on their broadcast channels. I do see your point about it being on youtube. But why don't the BBC only display adverts to those outside of the UK!?



"Stop hitting meh..." LOL I love Johnny Vegas :D
shibzy0tennant 9 months ago 10
@Fireodeath I know your comment is a year old, but it's recieved a large amount of "Thumbs Up". Does the name "Television Lisense" not give you a cluce? You have a license for your television(s) which states that your television(s) may recieve a broadcast signal. Since these clips are on YouTube, the BBC has every right to make money from advertisments placed before, after, next to or in said clips.
DarrelHerring 6 months ago 2