Angry Dumbledore
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (301)
-
@8x13Wolf Yeah, and that's why I think Michael Gambon fits so well for the role. He embodies the more serious and "darker" Dumbledore that needs to step up later on, compared to the first two films where Richard Harris (nothing against him at all :) plays a more joyful, kindhearted and mysterious Dumbledore.
-
I had noticed that Michael Gambon's Dumbledore is very different than Richard Harris's they even wear different color robes.
-
SILLLLEEIIIEEEENNCEEE!! XD TROLOLOLOLOLOLOL
-
@EverythingsUpload Richard Harris sounded very commanding, very easy to be taken serious; this shit was real. Whereas, Gambon, when he says "Silence", he sounds like some sort of prepubescent boy, voice wavering around and such D:
-
That "Don't you all have studying to do?" line is so *completely* not Dumbledore that I want to jam a wad of barbed wire up the writer's ass.
Of course, that's just a noteworthy moment in the overall experience of DOG SHIT since Gambon was inexplicably cast in this role.
-
HARRY DIJA POOCHANING IN DA CUPBOARD OF FAYA?
-
michael gambon is a terrible dumbledore
-
Totally agreed.
-
Michael Gambon once admitted in an interview that he'd never read the books. Reckon that explains a lot!!
-
HARRY PADDAH!
Book: "Did you put your name into the Goblet of Fire, Harry?" he asked calmly.
Movie: "HARRY DIDYA PUT UR NAME IN DA GOBLET OF FIYAA"
TGIFridayy 7 months ago 88
Dumbledore's not supposed to run around shouting and being commanding, because he never *needs* to. He can establish all the power and control in the world just by walking into the room and speaking; he doesn't throw it around, her radiates it.
In fact, when he does start becoming more snappish and stern in the final books, it's a grim reminder of just how serious things have gotten.
8x13Wolf 7 months ago 19