Feynman Chaser - The Key to Science
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like FeynmanChaser's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike FeynmanChaser's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add FeynmanChaser's video to your playlist.
Uploaded on Jul 13, 2008
Richard Feynman discusses how we would look for a new law.
-
Category
-
License
Standard YouTube License
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
The interactive transcript could not be loaded.
Loading...
Loading...
Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Loading...
-
0:57
Richard Feynman - Not Knowing Thingsby godisafraud.comFeatured
38,324
-
56:09
Richard Feynman on the Double Slit Paradox: Particle or Wave?by Bhikkhu Samahita
65,751 views
-
1:17:58
Richard Feynman on Quantum Mechanics Part 1 - Photons Corpuscles of Light.FLVby Narayan Behera
250,132 views
-
0:55
Richard Feynman on hungry philosophers (or do we see objects or only their light)by Morphics Zero
134,938 views
-
49:39
Richard Feynman - The Pleasure Of Finding Things Outby TheScienceFoundation
334,506 views
-
12
videos
Play all
Richard Feynman: Fun to Imagine (BBC Series, 1983)by flatone
-
2:46
R. P. Feynman on Algebra.by x1x2x3ct
156,585 views
-
9:01
Feynman: Take the world from another point of view (1/4)by Aaron Scher
414,876 views
-
1:31
Feynman and Readingby mrCdoubleT
51,669 views
-
1:01:37
Freeman Dyson: Heretical Thoughts About Science and Societyby bu
27,989 views
-
Richard Feynman
1,904 videos994
-
1:52
R. P. Feynman on social sciencesby All men by nature desire knowledge.
103,984 views
-
1:58
R. P. Feynman on the difference between knowing the name of something and knowing something.by All men by nature desire knowledge.
136,249 views
-
4:02
Richard Feynman - Quantum Mechanicsby Ben Chetcuti
28,323 views
-
2:15
Richard Feynman and Pseudoscienceby THE GODLESS CYCLIST
59,323 views
-
14:42
Leonard Susskind: My friend Richard Feynmanby TEDtalksDirector
60,042 views
-
1:26
Richard Feynman on Computer Science — Talk at Bell Labs (1985)by Jeff Dlouhy
30,056 views
-
4:08
Learn Faster with The Feynman Techniqueby Scott Young
144,895 views
-
1:18
What is Time?by Vintage ToonCast
73,827 views
-
4:53
Richard Feynman - Manhattan Projectby Ben Chetcuti
34,181 views
-
1:15
Feynman Chaser - Something Interestingby FeynmanChaser
34,757 views
-
6:24
Feynman: FUN TO IMAGINE 11: Ways of Thinking (Part One of Two)by Christopher Sykes
193,272 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Top Comments
mintclassic 1 year ago
GOD I want people to understand this.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
SIMON CROFT 1 year ago
This guy was more than a great phycicist he was a great human being - if it were possible to choose ones father I would not hesitate to choose this man.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
All Comments (154)
iamShadeY 5 days ago
yeah, string theory hasn't been tested, so they would have no reason to do that.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Laoch111 2 weeks ago
Richard P. Feynman: "If it disagrees with experiment, it’s WRONG."
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
phonon115 4 weeks ago
7 String "Theorists" dislike the video....
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Kevin Erazo 1 month ago
oh right, modern physics usually deals with microscopic phenomena which classical physics can't deal with. but when you develop a modern (micro) model, it has to produce to classical result if you expand its parameters. that's why i didn't say the GOAL of modern physics was to give the classical result, but that the check mark is given to modern models if they can produce the classical answer if it's expanded.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
totaljking12 1 month ago
I believe you mean aspires.. conspires usually implies malicious intent..
the goal of modern physics isn't get it to match previous classical results: modern physics produces the "right" answers. read the introduction to feynman's lectures on physics, it should be on google somewhere
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Kevin Erazo 1 month ago
right, that's why i said we gained a deeper understanding of the phenomena. And btw, the test of "modern" physics is that it conspires to produce the "classical" results. If any new physics contradicts previous results, it's discarded.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
totaljking12 1 month ago
calculations remained unaffected but our understanding of what's really happening was totally changed.. in that sense classical physics was totally effected and it is why we separate the two 'physics' into classical and modern
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Kevin Erazo 1 month ago
actually most of classical physics remained unaffected by relativity which is only relevant at high speeds. Einstein contribution was to create a more fundamental framework to work on, but as he worked he had to make sure his equations conformed to the established classical physics. So he didn't overthrow the consensus, rather he went deeper and allowed us to find out more.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
tomaalimosh 1 month ago
...And as soon as that consensus is reached, a guy like Einstein comes along and proves that "consensus on truth" wrong.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube