RawlsInst
Top Comments
All Comments (10)
-
Distribution of wealth is a deceptive term. That second pie chart was nonsense. Bill Gates has enough wealth to give about $5 to every person on the planet. But if he did that, it wouldn't be wealth anymore.
I'd like a gini coefficient of .30 or lower please. Too much inequality makes people unsatisfied and unhappy, no matter how good the living standards are for the folks at the bottom.
-
I would enter the society that had unequal wealth distribution, but a more or less equal chance for everyone who worked hard to get ahead.
-
The video had a legend, just not the chart. Take a guess that it is in 5 evenly distributed ranges from most wealthy, to least wealthy. I'll take wide middle bands and small edge bands.
-
PS: Nice website, Dan! :)
-
Interesting survey. Took me a while to figure out what Conservativism and Liberalism signified, so it served me as a worthy lesson on US politics :)
The taxes add a bit of a stir to the whole question - when you're rich, you don't necessarily want to have your wealth redistributed, huh?
Do the taxes have any influence on the poorer groups? (Such as improved social security?)
-
Gee... If Karl Marx had just drawn an oversimplified pie chart instead of writing a manifesto we would have been living in a socialist paradise by now.
-
Norway.
-
Why has the other video been pulles? Would have liked to read the comments a little...
PS: I would again go for B. imho, Denmark should be role model regarding this topic.
-
You should of offered A. for unequal wealth or B. equal wealth.
I vote for B. Equal Wealth distribution
I am assuming this question is strictly focused on how wealth is distributed across a country. It is not asking how would you distributed the wealth under the present circumstances.
This survey is missing a pretty important part, a chart legend. :)
Djizs 1 year ago 3