Nassim Haramein: The Schwarzschild Proton

new N.Haramein's paper,

video from Alienscientist youtube channel
read more on theresonanceproject.org

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Haramein
• gravity

[GLANL]

@trefnwyd What I find hilarious as a physics student is that in one of Harameins "scientific papers" he refers to WIKIPEDIA as a source :P. To find science in his papers is like playing 'where's Waldo' where Waldo has been lynched by a crowd.

[MrTriangularity]

@GLANL I also see a lot of evidence towards a consciousness-shift at this time. It's nice to see a lot of support for Ron Paul, I'm a big fan of Ron Paul.

[MrTriangularity]

@bkedzie Yes, no scientist has disproven Nassim. On the contrary, identifiable scientists support his work.

[bkedzie]

@MrTriangularity I concur with you about Nassim. I have researched this man's publ. paper. I am at a loss, Nassim has peer reviewed work. GLANL & others should use wikipedia to get a better understanding of peer reviewed published paper. This is scrutinized by scientists in the world. They found ZERO out of place. The purpose No paper gets published, all anomalous aspects must justified/proven beyond the critique. Then resubmitted for further review until clean then published.

They built on sand

[MrTriangularity]

@GLANL It's hard to believe. I have personally seen accurate depictions of the future in dream-states and learned to read syncronicity in my own life experience. I also regard the Wikipedia censorship of Nassim as unusual, particularly when I see a number of other researchers that believe in aliens who have had their Wiki pages deleted. I think the authorities are censoring this guy.

[GLANL]

@MrTriangularity Besides that I've closed the "nassim haramein"-chapter a month ago. If you think he's a great scientist and you're right, that would great. Untill that day I remain sceptical. Mostly because of his spiritual claims and physical claims like when he calls everything 'schwarzschild radius" like vaginas and egg cells or that the penis is a vector (it might indicate direction but not force). In Dutch and German a 'field' is called a 'body' .... so it might be a vector, what a joke :)

[GLANL]

@MrTriangularity I could give a lot of ad hominem reasons. Besides that I have an odd troublesome feeling about free energy. If there would be an infinite amount of energy why can't we measure it? Anyhow, my argumentation should dwell somewhere on the internet so that might be the best place to look.

[GLANL]

@MrTriangularity When wikipedia refers to an objective source you should use that objective source not wikipedia which can be altered by persons who are not per se scientists. When it hasn't been researched how does wikipedia know it?

"wikipedia is allowed to be imperfect" source: Wikipedia

[MrTriangularity]

@GLANL Well, you don't like one reference (it's hard to reference work that hasn't been researched, so Wikipedia seems acceptable to me in that instance). Could you please provide evidence for Nassim and his fellow researchers putting out bad science? I believe his/their work is good.

[GLANL]

@MrTriangularity I find my lecture notes on spacetime and tensors brilliant, I do read more than wikipedia pages.