Bill Maher on Republican Loss

11/07/08 episode of bill maher new rule

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

• bill
• maher
• new
• rules
• realtime
• real
• time
• republican
• democrat
• obama
• funny
• political

[Stingerbillion]

@Monawanaha Do you realize that fiscal year ends/begins from Oct 1st (insert year), so Bush's fiscal year ended in October 1st, 2009, that was BUSH'S fault, not Obama. Regardless, the unemployment rate has been declining steadily, of course, no thanks to the republicans. Btw, fiscal year ended for Obama from Oct 1st 2009-Oct 1st 2010, and he help create 900,000, in addition to 2-3 million jobs he saved/created with stimulus package. We'll see what happens from Oct. 1st 2010-Oct. 1st 2011(?).

[silveraltar]

@Monawanaha What's the "US Department of Finance?" No such agency exists. You, sir, are a liar.

[26yearstoorion]

Too late Bill, they did... over & over & over (yet seriously derainged people continue to support these creatures, WHY? )

[mizzfoxy9]

@BANBANBANBANful I think ,it would certainly help ha ha But you know is Head would stil be huge......

[winchester169]

@patrickthesaint haha... "peer review" sounds vaguely similar to "congressional pay raise"

[patrickthesaint]

@Edgehead10075 How do we know Lindzen work hasn't been peer-reviewed? Because it has remained a belief on the fringes of the scientific community. When something survives the process of peer-review, it moves from the fringe to the mainstream.

How do we know which side has the agenda? Simply follow the money trail. Look at where the believers get their funding from, look at where the deniers get their funding from.

[Edgehead10075]

How do we know Lindzen hasn't been peer-approved? Just looking at the Wikipedia article on him, I can see that he has at least one colleague who agrees with him and says that many of his OLDER colleagues are skeptical of manmade global warming. I will admit, though, that not everyone is as adamant as Lindzen. How do we know that there isn't an agenda on the other side?

[patrickthesaint]

@Edgehead10075 Then go by the knowledge of the scientists who have peer reviewed the data and concluded that climate change is real and that it's man-made. Ignore the scientists who deny climate change is real due to the fact that either their data hasn't been peer reviewed or they are on the corporate payroll.

Trust me, the "controversy" about climate change is in the same form as the "controversy" over whether the holocaust happened. The people who deny it have an agenda.

[Edgehead10075]

Unfortunately, I'm not a scientist, so I can't go by my own knowledge of the issue, which would be pretty useful for this issue.

[Edgehead10075]

The only time Lindzen received money (which he admits) was to pay for his travel costs. He receives nothing for his claims. Also, he doesn't deny climate change. Honestly, I'd like to see a debate between him and someone else. If Lindzen's argument was to fall apart, I'd seriously consider changing my mind.

Right now, the voices against anthropogenic global warming are very loud and adamant. Personally, I don't think that all these people are just full of shit, but you see it differently.

[Edgehead10075]

Oh, shut up, you dork.