Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Professor Steven Jones on MSNBC

Steven Jones on "The Situation Room" with Tucker Carlson. Why won't Tucker play the Professor's clip? Why does he keep trying to change the subject every time Building 7 is mentioned?  
 
Customize

More From: thetruthwillout

Loading...

QuickList(0)

156 ratings
Sign in to rate
31,669 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (323)   Options

Loading...
jgrimsl1 (8 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Thermite can be made into a paint form. You can simply paint it on walls, no big cumbersome explosives needed.
ubertuberx5 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
This is fascinating! The anchor was absolutely trying to shut him up! It appeared as if he was being coached. This is a good indication that the parties involved have close access to the various branches in media.... follow the stench of greed and power to find the culprits. (usually found around large quantities of money)
niverent (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
They wouldn't show WTC7 falling. That says alot. They wouldn't even show it.
smujismuj (1 month ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
Show the video, tucker....show the video tucker....show the video tucker...
JunBoogy (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -3
Marked as spam
There are some obvious flaws in this guys theory. The biggest would be that nobody saw any explosives strapped to the support beams. Some beams were not exposed and would have required walls being knocked out. Someone would have noticed that.

Those buildings do not sit empty at night. They have an army of cleaners running all around that place. Not to mention the security guards.

911 took place on a Tuesday. Maybe if it was a Monday morning they would have had time to set some charges.
imbrd (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
it didn't just happen overnight- these things MUST b pre planned no way around it.
nd going by the laws of physics which stand as the only laws to truly abide by, it is structurally IMPOSSIBLE for things like pancake theory, fires & the like to really effect the collapse like it did: virtual freefall w/ little fire, & has very symmetric collapse (not assymetric which is signature of fires) & also the alloted time of freefall points to no other plausible explanation
trillion33 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
that Tucker sure is a Zionist dolt. Don't fear the reaper, beat him at his own game and die on Your terms! You always have that choice!
xadam2dudex (2 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
a diesel fuel fire could not have burned hot enough to bring down WTC 7 diesel doesn't burn hot enough to soften structural steel... jet fuel is also mostly Kerosene based fuel with additives to help it keep from freezing smoke control etc
frankyrocksmyrocks (2 months ago) Show Hide
+4
Marked as spam
everybody needs to be as collected as Steven Jones when discussing this, not many people will changed their established view points when taking information from a loud drunken mess of a person, get your shit together first, then lecture. much respect to Steven Jones
jumpa01 (2 months ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
Why do these guys never have any time for the guys holding the evidence? Also he kept interrupting the poor guy and starting over then they don't even play the clip the guy sends them WTF? seems funny to me as soon as they find Nano Thermite they all of a sudden admit to wiring building 7

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.