@ihaterobbie123 Perhaps the fact that most of those who voted on it were not among the founding fathers makes it too difficult for you to comprehend that it makes it outside of the constitution they wrote. They had tried to include a Bill of Rights when it was being written, however MOST of the Founding Fathers were against the idea of needing such rights.
@InuKun2008 And since it's an amendment to the constitution, and instituted during the time and under the guidance of the founding fathers, it is a part of the constitution written by the founding fathers.
How difficult is this to understand for you? An amendment to the constitution isn't really a part of it? At what hour of the night did that bullshit spring to mind?
@MrChimochay Actually, the Founding Fathers didn't put it in the Constitution. It was an amendment introduced later on after ratification, hence why it is the second AMENDMENT.
@ihaterobbie123 Perhaps the fact that most of those who voted on it were not among the founding fathers makes it too difficult for you to comprehend that it makes it outside of the constitution they wrote. They had tried to include a Bill of Rights when it was being written, however MOST of the Founding Fathers were against the idea of needing such rights.
InuKun2008 2 months ago
@InuKun2008 And since it's an amendment to the constitution, and instituted during the time and under the guidance of the founding fathers, it is a part of the constitution written by the founding fathers.
How difficult is this to understand for you? An amendment to the constitution isn't really a part of it? At what hour of the night did that bullshit spring to mind?
ihaterobbie123 2 months ago
@MrChimochay Actually, the Founding Fathers didn't put it in the Constitution. It was an amendment introduced later on after ratification, hence why it is the second AMENDMENT.
InuKun2008 4 months ago
WHAT WITH THIS OBSESSION WITH GUNS?
bbphnix 9 months ago
This is why I support the second amendment, but don't join the NRA.
DeadFishFactory 10 months ago
@88Keyz101
Yes, words can (And do) endanger the public safety. (Especially in times of war)
TheBoberton 11 months ago
@TheBoberton
Words dont endanger the public's safety. Your analogy is flawed & way off base.
88Keyz101 11 months ago
@88Keyz101
Because guns and words have both advanced since the time of the Founding Fathers, and they are both freedoms guaranteed by the US Constitution.
TheBoberton 11 months ago
@TheBoberton
How the fuck do you equate words & guns? That's the stupidest argument I heard on this whole forum.
88Keyz101 11 months ago