OBAMA MOONWALKING -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5J2W7gFzChM fail best man blog win funny hilarious afro ninja viral video youtube crash accident road car police stop cam vlog trip fall bike prom dress lol old the be to what how on Interview Failblog Blog Videos Comedy reporter news anchor bmx fight cctv live real baby cute internet megan fox jennifer aniston damage storm wet pool large advert economy obama clinton healthcare socialism joker poster angry vs so to family sing singer dance dancer ride entrance leap hockey sex south park the view
Just think, after all these years, the demolition companies have got it all wrong. You don`t need to spend days and lots of money to wire up a building with explosives to bring it down. All you need to do is what the skeptics are saying. You just buy a box of matched, douse the building with jet fuel and then light a few fires at the base of the building, and then after a few hours of burning, the building will come crashing down in a free fall manner and turn to dust. Haha!
ManFromMelbourne 1 month ago
Ok, pizzlepazzle, what about building 7 where not a drop of jet fuel was involved? In fact, it wasn`t even hit by a plane. So what made building 7 collapse at a free fall speed? Let`s hear your answer to this one.
ManFromMelbourne 1 month ago
@TangerJo
A B-25 bomber has a wingspan of 67 feet, compared with 156 feet for a Boeing 767. The fuel capacity of the B-25 bomber was 1,000 gallons, as compared with 24,000 gallons for a Boeing 767. As well, the speed at which a B-25 bomber traveled was far less than the ~500 mph than the speed that the two Boeing 767's were traveling when they hit the World Trade Center.
How stupid are you? A 767 is much bigger than the b-25 and weighs 10 times as much. Keep grasping for straws.
pizzlepazzle 1 month ago
@TangerJo Yeah and Im sure it was going almost 600 mph. The B52 didnt do near as much damage as these did. By the way learn how to read.......I said COMMERCIAL plane, not just any plane. You just sort of proved my point. The Empire State building didnt collapse. So doesnt that mean since the towers did, it may just have something to do with the design of the towers?
pitt15220 3 months ago
@pitt15220 Yeah you must never read history. How about the B25 that flew straight into the Empire State Building in 1945. Full of fuel. Check. Office Building. Check. Building Collapse? Hell no. Not even close.
TangerJo 3 months ago
Right....no building has ever collapsed due to fire. What you morons are leaving out is the fact that an airplane slammed into them first, destroying 7 or 8 floors, weakening ALL those steel beams. Fly a plane fully loaded with fuel into a building and let it burn, and see what the outcome of that is. This is a unique situation, has a commercial plane, full of fuel, ever flown into an office building before?
pitt15220 3 months ago
All AE 911 wants is contributions to the Paypal account.
If Gage had some Miracle Spring Water, he could sub for Peter Popoff.
LindaStevensBZ 5 months ago
Just because RT gives two minutes airtime to 9/11 conspiracy theorists, it doesn't follow that they 'proved' a conspiracy. All they did was air a differing view to the status quo, they didn't prove anything.
stoltobot 11 months ago
@RussianBoxer84- It's important.!
They know where this is going. And why.. You think we are curious and want to know.
What if the outcome of this is going to their door step. As another false flag opperation. And we attack them. They are plotting another world war. Population control. So go figure.
Snowman374th 1 year ago
New JESUS Conspirisy !!! watch video at jagball22
jagball22 1 year ago