Evolution vs. Thermodynamics?

It's hard to believe that people still think there's a conflict between abiogenesis/evolution and the second law of thermodynamics. Here I explain why this is not the case.

And no, I'm not a big fan of Voyager. In my opinion, TNG was the best one.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• abiogenesis
• thermodynamics
• evolution
• darwin
• entropy
• dawkins
• biology
• creationism
• christianity

[HumanChemistry101]

The “open, closed, isolated” answer, “local entropy decrease” answer, etc., are nothing but decade old regurgitations. The underlying issue that Hovind Jr. is prying away at is abiogenesis: creating life from non-life. This is something that cannot occur. Why? Because things we consider to be alive (such as you and I) are animated molecules, not “living” animated molecules (which is a religious neoplasm). Google "defunct theory of life" to learn more.

[Venaloid]

@HumanChemistry101 - Okay, so how does that prove that abiogenesis can't be true?

[GodPatrol]

Informative. However, you made a factual error. Voyager was WAY better than all the other series in the franchise.

[jamesmaseobrown]

@GodPatrol

Deep Space Nine was the absolute worst.

[gregrutz]

@RaptorWizard Creatards don't understand how evolution can happen because it made life got more complex over time. They have not idea what a 'system' is in thermodynamics.

[Faithmaster]

Troll face in coffee cup. :)

[futureorreligion]

Looks like cretard has unleashed votebot to downrate your video.

Thats the only thing they can do (censor), cause no one (except severely brainwashed/damaged individuals) will never believe their nonsense after seeing videos like this.

[abborne1]

DS9 has well-written characters, alien species with believable conflicts, and mercifully few spatial anomalies and holodeck malfunctions. Voyager is just flavor-of-the-week space clouds of weirdness, pulled-out-of-our-ass particle-physics technobabble dei-ex-machina, and Jar Jar Neelix.

[Mithcoriel]

Ugh, these guys are so silly. Their real argument is just "But how did life just come from non-life?" and they package it in this phony interpretation of thermodynamics. You explain to them they got the thermodynamics wrong, they say "But how did life come from non-life?" and assume that that somehow shows your definition of thermodynamics is wrong.

"Bob can't be the murderer cause thermodynamics say he wasn't at the crime scene." "Thermodynamics don't say that." "But he wasn't at the scene."

[RaptorWizard]

i dont get wat evilution got 2 do wit monkeys and heat wtf!!??