The 'Razzies' - which select the worst films from Hollywood - have given multiple awards to two actors who played multiple roles in their films, Lindsay Lohan and Eddie Murphy. (Jan. 21)
Alot of critics have hidden agendas, and i have my suspections, but until there is enough proof. The Razzies get the job done without exposing any biased on their parts, however. Only in time will we know for sure.
I agree, that the Razzies simply pick the films that even the most least in depth fan could spot a mile away as a fraudulently bad film. Eitherway, with what they do rate, they get the job done. So, i have to say, well done enough, but they could go deeper with the ratings. They missed quite afew last year.
yea so true. mostly all the movies are awful and sometimes the actors nominated are really good, it's just the script's fault for making them seem bad. idk. the razzie's is funny/sad/cool. just cause it's a bad movie doesn't mean the actings bad, and just because it's a great movie doens't mean the acting is good. it could be the directing of it, the script, whatever. but either way you're right. lol
The Razzie Awards could have had more meaning if they didn't always choose such safe targets. Everybody already knows that the movies they chose were bad. The sad fact is that The Academy Award winners often aren't much better than the Razzie awards. They could really make an impact if they would actually bother to nominate some of the films that are nominated for Academy Awards as well. Some Academy Award winning movies are pretty stupid. The Razzies are just playing Hollywood's game!
Alot of critics have hidden agendas, and i have my suspections, but until there is enough proof. The Razzies get the job done without exposing any biased on their parts, however. Only in time will we know for sure.
OldySchool 2 years ago
I agree, that the Razzies simply pick the films that even the most least in depth fan could spot a mile away as a fraudulently bad film. Eitherway, with what they do rate, they get the job done. So, i have to say, well done enough, but they could go deeper with the ratings. They missed quite afew last year.
OldySchool 2 years ago
yea so true. mostly all the movies are awful and sometimes the actors nominated are really good, it's just the script's fault for making them seem bad. idk. the razzie's is funny/sad/cool. just cause it's a bad movie doesn't mean the actings bad, and just because it's a great movie doens't mean the acting is good. it could be the directing of it, the script, whatever. but either way you're right. lol
dcnut1234 3 years ago
I LOVE SEX WHO ELSE IS WITH ME? Q
Ammiga77 3 years ago
Why don't they televise the Razzies a day before the Oscars,because all I know is that we get to know the "winners" in the nest days newspaper.
sugreev2001 4 years ago
yup like Reese Witherspoon.. in walk the line
kncocalderon 4 years ago
they are so wrong about saying, transformers, is obnoctious and nicholas cage, was nominated for the worst.
SpizzleT 4 years ago
The Razzie Awards could have had more meaning if they didn't always choose such safe targets. Everybody already knows that the movies they chose were bad. The sad fact is that The Academy Award winners often aren't much better than the Razzie awards. They could really make an impact if they would actually bother to nominate some of the films that are nominated for Academy Awards as well. Some Academy Award winning movies are pretty stupid. The Razzies are just playing Hollywood's game!
tangerine6773 4 years ago