Neil Armstrong Wont Swear On The Bible

Neil Armstrong Wont Swear On The Bible that he walked on the moon and is offered $5000 to do whatever with give to a good cause or whatever. enough said

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Neil
• Armstrong
• Wont
• Swear
• On
• The
• Bible
• moon
• landing
• lies
• fake
• proof
• must
• see

[ChrisiJ3RKCarder]

he dont have to prove a point

[frogweaver111]

I know who is wrong. . People who claim 'logical sense' that nothing happened and also call others stupid for believing it did. You know nothing of yourself and nothing of deception. Lies this big deserve better than what you give, acting as gatekeepers of truth, and preventing harmonious resolution with your negativity. If you really were content that it was 'fully debunked', then you would offer friendlier words or actions - not inflicting others with your self doubt and pity.

[66thoughtless]

its about lance believing in aliens nothin to do wth wheather he actually went thier

[wearefused]

science flies you to the stars, religion flies you into buildings

[TheBaldmeister]

@BritishTruthSeeker I'm not trying to socre points here - I genuinely think it is a real shame that some people want to believe this conspiracy nonsense when the true story of the Apollo missions is so much more interesting.

If you really seek the truth, have look at clavius dot org which explains away all of the hoax claims, then maybe you can finally appreciate the great achievement that the Apollo missions were.

[waheex]

It's got to the point with this hoax nonsence that if it is proved correct, it is more impressive than actually landing on the bloody moon. Pulling this hoax off would be a monumental undertaking once never mind 6 times. Theres a CH4 docum where Percy, Bennet etc are waffling on about the 'hoax' and one of the Hb's asks why fake 6 times?, it's like a light bulb went off in his head. He suddenly starts to question his beliefs.Pure gold. But alas critial thinking is dead, all we have is belief.

[TheBaldmeister]

@Shayanpac So what? Armstrong didn't see stars from the lunar surface, and Collins was never on the lunar surface, so the comparison is meaningless.

For sure Collins could have seen stars while orbiting the night side of the Moon, if the cabin lights were dim enough.

[waheex]

someone please post a link to a SPECIFIC example of a photo that is a fake?

I mean can we get back to the evidence for a fake or lack thereof?

Specific, scientific examples. Not 'astronaut look tired therefore Apollo is a hoax' BS or 'the is just something not quite right about XYZ'

I mean JAXA, Indian space agency and NASA LRO have photographed the landing sites. Surely NASA. I mean thousands of independent astronomers have looked at these images. Not one credilble accusation of fakery.

[waheex]

@BritishTruthSeeker WHY the fuck should he? - I mean really. Swearing on a bible has no relevance on the argument on the moon landings. it boils down to science & evidence.

I mean the bible - an old book written by goat hearders. They didnt even know why folk got sick.

Eugene Cernan was on stargazing live BBC, Prof B Cox etc questioned him at length. Are you seriously saying Cernan was lying & Cox and all the 100's thousand viewers are thick?

[BritishTruthSeeker]

@prosperomage The "actual trail of money and power"? That is an easy one, but it's too off-topic for here.