Capitalism vs Socialism

Which is more productive?

Category:

Education

Tags:

• ron
• Paul
• Reagan
• taxes
• hillary
• obama
• clinton
• barrack
• election
• 2008
• iraq
• iran
• news
• democrat
• republican
• money
• wealth

[MegaAble1234]

but Capitalism and Socialism is all FREEDOMS!!!!

[victorydayof91945]

@3DSFuture The difference is big Under Capitalism is falling of culture, moral falling , falling of education, aggression in society, conflicts, perversions, nationalism, various deviations of mind and the psyche, obesity, dullness. Appearance of the various dependencies, drug addiction, gambling addiction ... the arrival of the various sects etc and etc...

[StPeteDada]

Communism technically means no money, no classes, no state, everybody owns everything, everything is distributed to each other based on need and when someone doesn't need something anymore it is simply given back for anybody who needs it. Communism doesn't work well in the context of industrial civilization as Marxists would like, it is however the economic system of nomadic hunter-gatherers.

[victorydayof91945]

@3DSFuture Capitalism has no culture or moral component. What is morality in buy-sell system? All things is moral that is makes a profit! For Capitalism love is business, people are commodities and money is god! Capitalism provides freedom for baser instincts of man and it makes a profit by parasitizing on this. Some people are try running away from immorality of capitalism to religion, but in there they just come to control of some people who just use them for self, for political purposes

[3DSFuture]

@victorydayof91945 No, its under socialism is falling of culture. Look at scandinavian countries, that's are socialists countries and they culture is dead.

Falling education ? Americans were best educated people in XIX century of capitalism.

What conflicts, what perversions, nationalism ??? We are talking about CAPITALISM, you are too stupid like every sub-humans socialist to read what is capitalism

[3DSFuture]

Look at west european countries and east, post soviet countries. That's different beetween capitalism and socialism

[alex29443]

everywhere there is a socialist nation, there is a failure to meet the needs of the poeople of that nation - suck on Scandinavia's (and indeed many parts of europe's) massive dangling balls!

there is a mis-conception that anything socialist is actually communism - in fact, it is easy for there to be financial incentives across a socialist society if you build it right. it is no crime for a government to take control or partial control of sectors which the free market can't efficiently operate.

[masterskyrunner]

@yosbertt Do you actually think we have Capitalism? When there are few rich and many poor, that is not capitalist, because you are missing one factor: MIDDLE CLASS. In order for any nation to be a nation, it needs to have rich and poor, or all poor. But laissez faire capitalist states have middle classes, mostly people with good jobs or small businesses. A truly genuine society. When there are few rich and many poor, it is caused by corp. inflation and overproduction and underconsumption.