Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 lens review - DSLR FILM NOOB

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
30,732
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 6, 2011

http://www.dslrfilmnoob.com/2011/03/06/tamron-17-50mm-f2-8-review/ The Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 lens fits firmly in the value category. At between $350 and $450 this lens covers a very usable range and an affordable price. If you are making the jump to a DSLR or trying to make do with the kit zoom the Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 will be a nice step up.

On the positive side: Price, Sharpness, and Fixed f2.8 across all focal lengths

On the negative side: Noise auto focus, no full time manual focus, lens barrel extends out, and the lens is made out of plastic

The Focal range is very usable the picture quality is very good and you are probably willing to put up with the focus noise for the price tag. You can pick one up here:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000EXR0SI?ie=UTF8&tag=dfn0c-20&link...

Equipment used in this video:
Canon 7d & t2i
Canon 35mm f1.4
Tamron 17-55mm f2.8
Sennheiser G2 wireless mic
CPM FILM TOOLS rig

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 7 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (onelonedork)

  • will i get as good results with the tamron, as the canon 17-55mm f2.8 is usm???

  • @supersabre69 Probably not.

  • tamron 17-50mm or sigma 17-50mm?

  • @JohnboyStudios Tamron.

see all

All Comments (62)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I think the SP stand for Super Performance

  • @onelonedork Deejay, whenever I am going to buy new stuff I always come check for a video from you on it first (and you always seem to have one no matter what it is). Thanks a ton for all the info you share with us.

  • i have this lens and have done plenty of photo shoots and filming with it. The non VC version works excellent in low light for video. I'd only be concerned with the non VC if ur TAKING PHOTOS in very, very low light. Use a tripod or get some steady hands.  However, for well lit photo shoots, ur good The auto focus noise is not a big deal unless you're a ninja and i don't know how flipping a switch from af to mf is "inconvenient". It's a really good lens. Very sharp with great value.

  • 0:54 "Me Gusta"

  • @onelonedork why not? explain us :D

  • how accurate/fast is focus in low light ... need some cheap to shoot some concerts

  • Thanks for the review, nice and concise. Subscribed. 

  • today i've broken my tamron's autofocus motor :(

  • do you put lights up in the back to make a cool bokeh effect or what?

  • Is this the vc or non vc?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more