Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 lens review - DSLR FILM NOOB
Uploader Comments (onelonedork)
All Comments (62)
-
I think the SP stand for Super Performance
-
@onelonedork Deejay, whenever I am going to buy new stuff I always come check for a video from you on it first (and you always seem to have one no matter what it is). Thanks a ton for all the info you share with us.
-
i have this lens and have done plenty of photo shoots and filming with it. The non VC version works excellent in low light for video. I'd only be concerned with the non VC if ur TAKING PHOTOS in very, very low light. Use a tripod or get some steady hands. However, for well lit photo shoots, ur good The auto focus noise is not a big deal unless you're a ninja and i don't know how flipping a switch from af to mf is "inconvenient". It's a really good lens. Very sharp with great value.
-
0:54 "Me Gusta"
-
@onelonedork why not? explain us :D
-
how accurate/fast is focus in low light ... need some cheap to shoot some concerts
-
Thanks for the review, nice and concise. Subscribed.
-
today i've broken my tamron's autofocus motor :(
-
do you put lights up in the back to make a cool bokeh effect or what?
-
Is this the vc or non vc?
will i get as good results with the tamron, as the canon 17-55mm f2.8 is usm???
supersabre69 7 months ago
@supersabre69 Probably not.
onelonedork 7 months ago
tamron 17-50mm or sigma 17-50mm?
JohnboyStudios 8 months ago 4
@JohnboyStudios Tamron.
onelonedork 7 months ago 11