Rorty on William James (Part 1)
Top Comments
All Comments (16)
-
@LoquaciousApe ty
-
@greenghost2008 Rorty's take was that Truth, in its strictest philosophical sense, is ultimately unjustifiable because it cannot be quantified without self-referential justifications. From this, he concludes that justification is all that people can talk about meaningfully - "Justification is relative to an audience... Truth isn't relative to anything." He did not take social justification to be the criterion for truth, but social approval to be basis for justification.
-
does anybody know where this lecture was given? or when?
-
@stopEcocidE Sorry, the objectivist is my brother, who was logged in to me. He's Greenghost.
-
Would you mind elaborating your point? What, says you, characterizes a non-objectivist, and in what sense would Rorty be one?
-
I read about rorty in a book by a guy named blackburn. rorty seems to make social justification a criteria for truth. which is crazyness
-
stuffy asssehole.. do the james!
He'll never make it to TED talk
abg420 1 year ago 5
@greenghost2008
Have you thought about reading him, rather than reading about him, before you call him crazy?
ἰδιῶτα
stopEcocidE 1 year ago 2