UK CABINET TAKE OATH OF ALLEGIANCE TO HEAD OF STATE

UK CABINET TAKE OATH OF ALLEGIANCE TO HEAD OF STATE

Courtesy: Parliament

NOT only is there the OATH of ALLEGIANCE of MPs - but there is ALSO the Privy Council OATH of PRIVY COUNCILLORS that ALL potential members of the Cabinet MUST SWEAR in order to be part of HM's "INNER [Sanctum of] GOVERNMENT" !




THE OATH of a PRIVY COUNSELLOR [TO ENSURE NO TREASON OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL - HM's PRIVY COUNCIL]

"You do swear by Almighty God to be a TRUE and FAITHFUL [i.e. FULL OF FAITH] Servant unto The Queen's Majesty as one of Her Majesty's Privy Council. You will NOT know or understand of any manner of thing to be attempted, done or spoken against Her Majesty's Person, Honour, Crown or Dignity Royal, but you will lett and withstand the same to the uttermost of your power, and either CAUSE it to be REVEALED to Her Majesty Herself, or to such of Her Privy Council as shall ADVERTISE Her Majesty of the same. You will in ALL things to be moved, treated and debated in Council, FAITHFULLY and TRULY declare your MIND and OPINION, according to your HEART and CONSCIENCE; and will keep SECRET all matters committed and revealed unto you, or that shall be treated of secretly in Council. And if any of the said Treaties or Counsels shall touch any of the Counsellors you will NOT reveal it unto him but will keep the same until such time as, by the CONSENT of Her Majesty or of the Council, Publication shall be made thereof. YOU WILL TO YOUR UTTERMOST BEAR FAITH and ALLEGIANCE [i.e. LOYALTY] TO THE QUEEN's MAJESTY; and will assist and defend all civil and temporal Jurisdictions, Pre-eminences, and Authorities, granted to Her Majesty and annexed to the Crown by Acts of Parliament, or otherwise, AGAINST ALL FOREIGN Princes, PERSONS, Prelates, States, or Potentates. And GENERALLY IN ALL THINGS YOU WILL DO AS A FAITHFUL AND TRUE SERVANT OUGHT TO DO TO HER MAJESTY
SO HELP YOU GOD"

YET SEVERAL OF THE CABINET MINISTERS UNDER THE 2010 CON-DEM(N) GOVERNMENT HAVE THEY NOT SWORN OTHER PRIVATE OATHS?:

i) TO FREEMASONRY (the Pagan entity that links to Secularism - linking to the Pagan deity of "LUCIFER") AS A PRIVATE OATH? [Which takes Precedence to any other Oath].
AND
ii) TO OTHER VERY SPECIFIC SOVEREIGN COUNTRIES (WITH A NUCLEAR ULTIMATE WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION - NOT SUBJECT TO THE NUCLEAR NON PROLIFERATION TREATY)?

Dr Malcolm JACK - CLERK OF THE COMMONS
Clerk of the Commons [its Chief Executive - his job is to ensure that MPs spend taxpayers' money responsibly - works very, very closely with the Speaker] - Dr Malcolm JACK is now paid more than the Prime Minister following a £25,000 increase in pay.

He now earns almost £195,000 - up 11 per cent on his salary of £175,000 the year before. Gordon Brown "only" earned £197,689! [4 houses in 3 countries: Islington, UK; Capmps Bay, South Africa & Cascais, Portugal [worth £4.5 Million] + Parliament Street "Grace & Favour" in great spendour - at taxpayer's expense].

The Clerk is the principal adviser to the Speaker on the House's privileges and procedures. The Clerk's other responsibilities relate to the conduct of the business of the House and its committees. The Clerk is also accounting officer for the House.

Dr Malcolm JACK, who enjoys the use of a grace and favour property at 3 Parliament Street, has received an increase in benefits in kind, from £20,000 to £25,000. He lives with his 55-year-old male partner, Robert BORSJE.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• UK
• UK_Cabinet
• Oath_of_Office
• Oath_of_Allegiance
• Head_of_State
• Sovereign
• Monarch
• Crown
• House_of_Commons
• Handshake
• Handshakes
• Secret_Handshakes
• Non_Verbal_Communication
• Master_Mason
• Freemason
• Freemasons
• Freemasonry
• Youpolitics
• Youlawmaster
• youhousing
• youfreemasonry
• youilluminati
• Youxsearch

[youpolitics]

It is because the PRIVATE OATH of FREEMASONRY takes precedence to the PUBLIC OATH of POLITICIANS & JUDGES - therefore: BANKING, POLITICS, LAW, CENTRAL Government, LOCAL Govt, BUSINESS, MEDIA, ACADEMIA etc protect their "Brethren" - yet this fact is NEVER admitted Publicly...

The Media NEVER refer to issues of FREEMASONRY... if they do, the Presenters refer in terms of "CONSPIRATOLOGY"; "MARGINALISATION" and "RIDICULE" - the Viewers tend to just "accept" what the "trusted" Presenter asserts

[youpolitics]

Are you aware that the CABINET as members of the PRIVY COUNCIL are ALL obliged to swear another Oath?

BUT the reason JamesPipper to your EXCELLENT observation - does it NOT lie in the fact that they swear another PRIVATE Oath to FREEMASONRY - the Cult - Religion - to LUCIFER!!! [The "Light" = Light of "LUCIFER" - look up p. 321 of "MORALS & DOGMA" by Albert PIKE [SGIG (33) - where the Great Secret of FREEMASONRY is exposed for ALL to read - but how many carefully read his authoritative text?]

[kanenkitten]

@baresolid: It came from some people not wanting to swear by God.

[crazyforcanada]

@crazyforcanada - we saw an example of a "slip" on the oath when President Obama was sworn in. He slipped more than once: in the public ceremony, and again when he was re-sworn privately, so he had to be re-sworn again until he got it right. Otherwise, all other things being in order, he would not lawfully be in office.

[crazyforcanada]

@MultiMindra - "reading the script" would be a precaution in view of the issue of illegality of an oath that is not word-for-word according the statute prescribing the oath. If the affiant tried to memorize the oath and flubbed a word, or changed the order of the words, or left words out, it would NOT be the oath prescribed by LAW, and it would not be a lawful swearing-in ceremony; and the person would not be lawfully sworn & could not assume their functions.

[crazyforcanada]

@youpolitics - what is the wording of the oath taken in freemasonry? Do you know? Thanks.

[crazyforcanada]

@crazyforcanada - Did you hear those words, "ACCORDING TO LAW". This is the Executive ECHOING the Queen's own Coronation Oath. That's the link. There are TWO OATHS operative here, to protect the nation and the people. The Queen's oath, and the oath of her Executive to her. They are interlocking oaths to respect the RULE OF LAW. If the people understood this, they might learn to control their governments more effectively.

[crazyforcanada]

@crazyforcanada - The Queen by her Coronation Oath promises to govern only according TO LAW; therefore, her Executive, who exercise HER powers, those for which she is personally responsible, must do likewise and thus they swear an oath to the Queen, the person ultimately responsible to CONTROL the Executive in order to prevent abuse of HER powers exercised by them.

[crazyforcanada]

The OATH to the Sovereign is widely misunderstood. The Sovereign is PERSONALLY LIABLE for the exercise of the Executive powers, even though exercised by others upon due election. The oath of the elected members or of Cabinet to the Sovereign is an implied promise NOT to abuse the powers; meaning not to use the powers for an alien purpose, but only according to law under the Constitution.

[baresolid]

Did Clegg 'declare and affirm' rather than swear? What is the constitutional basis for this?

[MultiMindra]

Hello youpolitics.

Thank you providing the Oath. Did anyone catch the fact that not one of those persons that were declaring and making affirmations of true allegiance to Her Majesty according to Law were able to do so without reading the Script?

Coming complete circle I guess.

US has 300m in the hands of 500 or so. What would happen if the 300m realized that they are actually freemasons or desendents of freemasons...

Here in Canada, we just realized that We are a Constituional Monarchy.