Fun With Creationist Arguments for God Part II

Ray Comfort's infamous "argument" about bananas being a great design by God. I have heard people say it is unfair for atheists to use the clip I used in this video because it is taken out of context. Really, it is not. Ray was trying to make an analogy between the design of a soda can by man, and the design of a banana by God. This point comes across clearly, and clearly it is fallacious.

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

• atheism
• theism
• creationism
• bananas
• kirk cameron
• ray comfort
• delusion
• moron
• god
• religion
• christianity
• islam
• science
• evolution
• natural selection
• artificial selection
• coconuts
• looney toons
• soda can

[MrIncomeProperty]

only a liberal athiest thinks that a fictious cartoon of a squirrel and unbreakable coconut relates to real life.. health care for all, entitlements for all. gimme gimme gimme... get a job Scott!!! That masters degree is cartoon cynicism wont take you very far!!!

[HungryNomadicLion]

@MrIncomeProperty Ha! You again. If you cannot even understand the reason I put the cartoon on there, then you are completely lost. "relates to real life?" What are you talking about?

PS, your continuous interest in my personal life is creepy. Maybe you should get out more???

[CaptEm1]

Religious people are so damn stupid it's scary. Nice vid.

[goonodeath]

LOL at Comfort not even doing enough research to realize humans made the banana before trying to debunk evolution. Just shows how these guys don't even research their own claims.

[windowzombie]

Mustached New Zealander to a banana: "MY GOD, fruit?"

[matthelion]

i love mozart



[Jdog4Jesus]

You might be right, but telling me creationism is a myth is not proof that it is. Logic can be represented in more ways than just the logic of science and mathematics, there is logic from an emotional, spiriitual, moral, cultural, sociological and psychological perspective as well, to name a few. Hypothetically, if God is real, and what the Bible says He has done is truthful, we would have to be arrogant to think that it's only really true if we can explain it in according to our understanding.

[goonodeath]

@Jdog4Jesus I can know for sure you aren't trying. Or you are doing it wrong or something.

Evolution is a fact. Creationism is a myth to try and support something that isn't real (god, hell, xtianity, ect.).

You can believe in myths all you want but when it comes down to it don't try to debate people on your myths being right because they aren't. They lack even the most basic level of evidence and are inconsistent with the principles of logic. You can choose to believe w/e you want though.

[Jdog4Jesus]

True, you can't know for sure if I am really trying, but using that as a reason to discount me is not science. What if I really am trying? Wouldn't you want to know, if perhaps there might be a reason to believe that you haven't found yet? Most of the world believes in things without having scientific support. I can tell you what is considered evidence for creationism, but unless your open minded about it, you might refute me because you don't want to believe it, it's a negative form of faith.

[goonodeath]

@Jdog4Jesus You have been searching for a reason to not believe in creationism and haven't found one? I have a feeling you aren't trying at all then.

Look. For anything to be believed we have to have evidence to believe it right? There is no evidence for creationism. None. That alone is reason enough to shrug off creationism as another made up response to science.

Now. When you couple that with the fact that evolution is an observed fact and the theory of evolution is proven basically...

[Jdog4Jesus]

That's what try to do with creationism sometimes, to act as if it could be false, to see if I could find support for that. So far, I haven't found anything but I'm still trying.