Origin of Life: (stevebee92653) Eukaryotes & Mitosis???

Addresses what has to be one of the most scientifically flawed videos about the origin of life on the Internet (Origin of Life made Difficult). In particular, its references to eukaryotic cells and mitosis.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• OOL
• origin
• life
• difficult
• stevebee92653
• DNAunion
• Rick
• Pierson
• Anders
• Lyndon
• eukaryotes
• mitosis

[JAMRAND]

Let me ask a stupid question.

What do you know about the origin of life and why doesnt anyone else know except you?

You plainly state over and over " Anyone that knows about the origin of life "

well do you or dont you .

Plz share..

[DNAunion]

I know a lot about the origin of life that the dullard Stevebee92635, "Dr." Anders Lyndon, doesn't. Such as ...

(1) mitosis would not have been the method of cell division for the first cells, (2) the first cells would not have had nuclei, (3) nor would they have had mitochondria, (4) nor would they have had over 500 enzymes, and that (5) DNA was not required for the origin of life.

[ChrisTheTruckDriver]

So I stumbled upon your videos while doing a search for "dr. anders lyndon". Your channel was one of the only relevant hits. Yet the guy lists his name as steve on yt. Question: Creationist liar or troll?

[DNAunion]

Stevebee/Dr. Anders Lyndon (neither are his real name) shows a lot of signs of Creationism, but claims he is not.

Troll? Well, I think he really believes the stupidity he spouts.

I would just chalk him up as a overbearing, scientifically ignorant asshole.

[snakeguy76]

I was at first going to give his video a chance because potholer54's was a simplistic video, but once he started going into mitosis I knew he had a 1st year bio education. I always thought the the DNA replisome was the evidence against design, because what all powerful all knowing designer would create a mechanism that he knew made copying mistakes, add a proofreader to correct most mistakes and then still let it go on making mistakes. Which can cause death and suffering.

[DNAunion]

***

snakeguy76: I was at first going to give his video a chance because potholer54's was a simplistic video ...

***

Yeah, and there are some errors in Potholer54's. For example, early on he says the earth is 4.7 billion years old. But that seemed minor and irrelevant to his main points.

But stevebee92653 talking about eukaryotes and mitosis in relation to the origin of life ... that's just retarded.

And I couldn't help but laugh at stevebee92653's use of MONTEMELLONITE! Too funny!

[flayktheone]

Thank you for your video response. I saw that guy's videos and my mind exploded at how seriously he takes himself, despite having no understanding of evolution, biochemistry, or the scientific method.

[Noisegator]

RepresentingTruth - how can you use such a name when you say things like, theories should have an expiry date? Would you say the same for scripture?

People with blind faith "get it right the first time" and never change their decision even when the evidence is overwhelming.

Science at least has the ability to reexamine its conclusions in light of new information.

"Science asks questions which may not be answered. Religion gives answers which may not be questioned."

[karamarouge]

@snakeguy76

Why cant dumb atheists get it in their heads that we dont determine design by trying to guess what the designer was thinking when he designed anything.

Since you cant get into the designer's mind the question or assumption about his intent would be just stupid.

I guess picasso's pictures must have evolved. In one of them, the eye is over there, the nose all over the place...Seriously what artist could have drawn such a messed up face?

[ThePunisherNWO]

Exactly, humans were desgined, not by jesus, but humans were designed.

[lockeisback]

thank you, i saw the same video and stopped about a minute from the end, i cudnt stand it. i appreciate ur video im glad to see tht someone else thinks there are ignorant people trying to portray themselves as knowledgeable thank you.

[gregrutz]

stevebee92653 is an IDiot. He will block you when you prove him wrong. steve if you read this >> you are an ass hole.

[warren52nz]

Wow, you so totally owned that "doctor". Pity so many people take other people's word for things without checking them out.

[Setherlast]

Register your hypercam, dummy!

[DiggityDogg56]

@DiggityDogg56 And he could/would not explain to me why our psychological perception of EM waves in the light wavelength proved that a mind is needed for EM waves to exist. Perception of material phenomena requires by definition some kind of 'mind' but how does perception of material phenomena get stood on it's head so that material phenomena now requires a mind for it's existence and not just it's perception? Again his classic non-engagement, 'you don't understand the question.' FU SB

[DiggityDogg56]

@DiggityDogg56 Forgot to add that to say the process of perception since it used energy to process the energy carrying the information and dissipated the energy by the very act of perception followed the 2nd law of thermodynaimcs. For steviebee to say otherwise, to reverse the process would therefore violate the 2nd law. Poor ignorant bastard could only reply by removing my comments, removing all comments and banning all comment. Steviebee you are a fucking retarded retard. Eat shit and die.

[DiggityDogg56]

@DiggityDogg56 (cont'd)... the weasely little asshole erase my comment, erased all comment and then disallowed comments on his video. Did I tell you what a weasely little prick he is. I commented on another video of his and the prick's answer was one of his classic non-engagement answers, 'you don't even understand the question' kind of crap. Yeah, that is his hallmark characteristic, non-engagement of the arguments given to him.