evolution birds dinosaurs

Many scientists are convinced that birds evolved from the dinosaurs. Numerous finds in recent years have seemed to support the hypothesis that birds descended from two-legged, running dinosaurs called theropods. http://www.pbs.org/
lifeofbirds/evolution/index.html

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• evolution

[MissHystic]

What program is this? It looks really interesting.

[gooddarkjedi]

@imperial881 not all dinosaurs where big. when the last arceoroptyx was found it was first mistaken for componatus.

[imperial881]

how come something tat is so big so giant...but become something so small....

[transtlantic]

@Eesa74

i also remind you of my challenge:

try explain AB resistance or plant speciation without using evo theory.

i do notice you always prefer to avoid plant speciation. i would dare to say: you deny speciation occurs.

no wonder people call creationists - morons.

no wonder it was so fucking easy to win the Dover trial. all you have is: "God did it". lolol

moron.

[transtlantic]

@Eesa74

1978? wow...science must have stopped since then! LOLOL

Murray medical microbiology, latest edition (2000s) and more updated scienceproves your ayala wrong (retired, btw):

Acta Biochim Pol. 1995;42(4):517-24.

Evolution and resistance expression of MRSA. Evaluation of beta-lactam antibiotics against a set of isogenic strains with different types of phenotypic expression

proof that the genes were not there before the man made compounds.

try again, dumbshit.

[transtlantic]

@Eesa74

MRSA: the ribosome remains FULLY functional. "normal bacterium"? what is a normal bacterium? please provide an example. want a species for you to try prove your claims? E.coli. name me a "normal bacterium": there are thousands of strains. which one is "normal"?

MRSA = no disability.

the resistance has nothing to do with the ribosome.

try another argument.

[transtlantic]

@Eesa74

MRSA: results from NEW genetic information being added to the bacterium. same happens with the streptomycin example you provided: the DNA changed, creating NEW information. dumbshit.

"the structure of the ribosome"? the ribosome is not DNA. you confuse genotype with phenotype, typical ignorant creationist mistake.

"disabled"? the mutants survive that means increased fitness. how is that "disabled"?

plus MRSA doesn't have anything to do with what you wrote.

[transtlantic]

@Eesa74

ribosome? lol... bacteria like MRSA results from a mutation that changes zero the structure of the ribosome.

why do you keep talking about streptomycin? MRSA, the M stands for Meticillin.

an example that proves all your crap wrong.

[transtlantic]

@Eesa74

MRSA is evolution where an accumulating mutations increases survival. no degradation. again: you dodged my example.

sucks to be you, dumbshit.

[transtlantic]

@Eesa74

where is the degradation in MRSA origin? loss of specifity? lol... what the fuck are you talking about. MRSA results from an INCREASE in information, not loss.

there is no "Point" in evolution. evolution occurs. it's a fact. period.

and YES evolution occurs EVEN if there is a reduction in fitness. because evolution is about CHANGE of species. no matter the form.