The Ultimate Proof of Creation Part 5

Download the AiG Android App - http://bit.ly/gYa1SK
Download the AiG iPhone App - http://bit.ly/gKArQi
AiG Windows 7 App - NOW! Via Zune, just search AiG or MAAM Apps

Evolutionists like Dr. Richard Dawkins speak authoritatively as if their not-even-theory were as good as fact. But building a case for naturalistic evolution is like trying to build a house in midair. No matter how solid the construction, the house will collapse without a foundation. Thus, evolutionists must assume biblical grounds to support their worldview. These biblical grounds—such as logic, morality, and uniformity—stem from the nature and power of the Creator God as revealed in the Bible.1 Yet evolutionists deny the Creator while resting their faulty beliefs on His foundation. By challenging their faulty basic assumptions that the laws of logic, absolute morality, and the uniformity of nature exist apart from the Creator, the Christian can prove that reasoning, absolute moral standards, and science itself must be based on the biblical worldview.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• God
• Jesus
• Christ
• Saviour
• Christian
• Devil
• Satan
• Evil
• Evolution
• Abortion
• Murder
• Help
• Depression
• Anger
• Heaven
• Hell
• Christianity
• science
• darwin
• Richard Dawkins
• age of the Earth
• mind control
• inspirational
• salvation
• Jesus Christ
• holy
• response
• brain
• truth
• spirit
• space
• defense
• lamb of god
• gospel
• future
• Tsunami
• Earthquake
• judgement
• disaster
• creationism
• intelligent design
• ID
• religion
• educational
• warfare
• health

[mohaakilla51]

@AIGvideos I'm not saying the info you're spouting is incorrect, rather I'm saying that you're either misinterpreting it or deceitfully portraying it inaccurately. I will assume it's the first of the two.

I never claimed that I deny the existence of god, by the way. I just dislike what this man is trying to say, as I believe it to be inherently wrong. You posted the videos believing what he said, so I'm asking you: how does logic presuppose the existence of a Christian God?

[AIGVideos]

@mohaakilla51 Logic as defined by the Dictionary is: reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity. Its validity which I like. True science can see and see again the facts of the whole world. One element is DNA. If DNA was to evolve it would need information added to it to evolve from a lesser complex version so to speak. Where does the info come from? DNA is the most well designed piece of info we see. Logic = It was designed by a Being more complex than it = God.

[mohaakilla51]

in the dna replication process. In fact, it's entirely possible that, during gestation, 1 lost piece of genetic information could result in the death of the fetus, as a deletion error would shift the rest of that chromosome, and cause it to be wrong. Also, I'll repeat the question I asked on a previous section of video: Where does he explain how or why the existence of logic presupposes a Christian God?

[AIGVideos]

@mohaakilla51 - Sorry bro/sis ... Logic - what is it? Look at the eveidence all around you! God exists but you don't want to admit it. I'll absolutely guarantee that if you contact this scientist directly via the AiG site you'll have all the answers you need. The Bible teaches us that unbelievers cannot see God (or his creation) and that if you humble yourself and pray He will meet with you and open your eyes. Can't help you much more than that bruv/sister.

[mohaakilla51]

@AIGVideos, it's blatantly obvious that you truly don't understand the concept of the human genome, and genetics in general.

My DNA is (hypothetically speaking), more than 1.6% different than yours. That's simply the way DNA and breeding in general works. It's highly unlikely that anybody will ever be, or has ever been, born with my exact DNA, or yours.

The 'loss of info' you speak of is a lot different than the genetic differences between us and chimps. A loss of info is usually an error...

[AIGVideos]

@mohaakilla51 - Its not my info mate - The Genome Project released all these facts, I'm just repeating them. The facts come from them not me. If I've gotten the names of things the wrong way round I apologise - but like I said, its not me thats coming up with the facts.

[unsuppakid]

@Daracon75

Lol, you also clearly don't understand probability or the concept of infinity.

[Daracon75]

@mohaakilla51 Actually your logic fails. Let me ask you something - if I performed the addition of 1 + 1, and then checked the result, and continued doing this an infinite number of times, would the result ever be equal to 3? Assuming the distance between the earth and the moon remained constant - If I jumped up and down an infinite number of times, would I ever be able to jump up to the moon?

Unlimited time does not make impossible things possible. Use some logic.

[mohaakilla51]

@AIGVideos continued, something like this: If an infinite number of monkeys with an infinite number of typewriters sat and messed around with the typewriters for an infinite number of time, every great work in the latin based languages would eventually be written. It's simply how the concept of infinity works: this statement is inarguably true. The same concept can be applied to the earth in it's formatiive stages, a very large number of molecules given a very long time created a basic lifeform

[mohaakilla51]

@AIGVideos I don't quite think you understand what I'm asking. I simply want to know how, in order for logic to exist, God must exist. Where is the train of thought behind that?

I'm glad you brought up the DNA part too though, as thats another fundamentally flawed part of his argument. Information does not necessarily derive from a higher being. It is completely possible for information to derive solely from chance. Take, for example, the metaphor of monkeys and typewriters. The metaphor goes...