modo is for artists

This is a short video created by Andy Brown to show off modo from Luxology.

www.modo3d.com

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• modo
• 3D.
• sculpting
• modeling
• subdivision
• surfaces
• animation

[ericspring]

@henriqvist It doesn't say "Artists only use Modo" you dipstick. "Modo is for artists" is just a simple and true statement. It's like saying "Water is for drinking", and you replying with "Well then what am I supposed to do with this milk!?"

[donttalkcrap]

@Mallte100 Where did you get that from,huh?

Did you work on Avatar and 300? I'm guessing you're just talking crap, because they in fact used more than a dozen different 3D packages, including modo. So next time you feel the urge to post, perhaps you should check your facts first before making a complete dick of yourself.

And learn some punctuation while you're at it. Lightwave is not the 'best they made'. :(

[jahyute1000]

wow!,great work...

[HappyWithPain]

@ericspring I agree with you, and I didn't see what henriqvist said, but according to your post it would be more like replying "Water isn't just for drinking" to someone who says "Water is for drinking", since milk is another element that had anything to do with it in the first place. (i.e.: artist->water, modo->drinking)

[JettMane]

amazing.

[JAttiGraph]

Try Shade 3D 12. Good and cheap.

[bloodydove5718]

@greenegsnham ask any professional artist, they're going to tell you its not the tool that makes you good. Sure different programs can make modeling easier or harder, but like i said its Less about the tool. If you dont understand the basics of the craft it doesnt matter what tool or program you use, its going to come out like crap

[greenegsnham]

@fabiobit Worng (as are most comments from ignorant LW fans)

Here's a quote " We modelled in modo, animated in xsi, and rendered the Mark 1 suit in Lightwave 9.3. Where did you get the idea we used fprime?"

Note that only the Mark1 was rendered in LW. That's the one that was only shown for a short bit in the begining of the movie. You will also notice that they DID NOT render it in modo.

[greenegsnham]

@JohnnyAngry85 Actually it has a terrible workflow.

[greenegsnham]

@Mallte100 Wong! stop getting all your information from Newtek. It was used in VERY SMALL PARTS of those productions. Most of the work was done in real 3d programs.

[greenegsnham]

@bloodydove5718 This couldn't be more wrong, except for the practice part.

[greenegsnham]

@Mallte100 More than likely they used a freelancer that used lightwave for a few small shots. The majority was done with "real" 3d software. Lightwave is dead, the prgrammers weren't even competent enough to finish "Core" and had to scrap the whole idea (after years of hype). Newtek is all about hype and has completely faild to follow through on most of their promises. About the only people using Lightwave any more are hobyists. The last SIGGRAPH was just plain sad.