Greenpeace : Amazing new technology cuts CO2 emissions 99.5%
Uploader Comments (andypants05)
Top Comments
-
oops... CO2 isn't a pollutant... if it was then we've been killing ourselves with seltzer water.
-
Now put The Technology Into Cars And We Found Our Answer... IF The Technology Exist, Works And True....
That Country Economy Will Blow Up Cause oF That.
All Comments (82)
-
This technology could ruin the carbon tax plans.
-
I invented a breakthrough source of energy which violates the law of conservation of energy. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena which violate the law of energy conservation. Making a 6 kW generator will cost $1200 in mass production, value of energy produced yearly $5400.
I am looking for $300 000 for a prototype and $3M for patents.
H. Tomasz Grzybowski
tel. +48-512-933-540
-
@andypants05 So what if it doesn't break down for millions of years? we built yucca mountain for that. You get no risk of cancer from watching TV, you do get risk from your cell phone and chemicals you digest, as well as from coal power plants that release PCB's into the air. Where as nuclear plants do not release any radiation or chemicals into the atmosphere. Not caring about costs would cause people to go into poverty, lowering standards of living, and life expectancy raising birth rates
-
There is no irony.
don't be ignorant...
of course, plants use co2!
The issue is that there is TOO MUCH of it right now, the system is out of balance.
If you make these improvements and reduce co2 in the enviroment, it's not like all the plants in the world will die.
Do your research and check your logic.
-
Cool
-
Do people not see the irony in Greenpeace wanting to cut down on atmospheric co2, the gas that plants breath to grow and survive? What a total fraud !
Lets say Tommy the Terrorist decides to pay Numnuts Nuclear a visit. What then?
I say no thx nuclear, our atmosphere is polluted enough without the risk of ANOTHER Chernobyl. Either by accident or purposeful attack. We can hardly call any technology reliable. And these are deadly chemicals we are talking about, ones that dont break down for MILLIONS of years. I get enough risk of cancer from watching TV thanks. Let's think sustainable and safe i say. Who cares about how many green notes it takes
andypants05 4 years ago
Okay to explain.
CO2
1 part carbon
2 part oxygen
Together a deadly mix. Called CO2.
This technology very cheaply separates these 2 parts into.
1 Part Carbon, which can be burnt at very high temperatures creating enough energy to run the technology + some.
2 parts oxygen, which can be safely released into the atmosphere.
As for mercury and other heavy particles.
It has a purification rate of 95.5% approx.
andypants05 4 years ago
The CO2 gets converted into its chemical compounds. The chemicals such as carbon become a powder substance which can then be reburnt at extremely high temperatures and the oxygen is released clean and clear back into the environment.
Using this method we are effectively burning the CO2 emissions for more energy.
andypants05 4 years ago