How Evolution Is Scientific Part 6: No Presuppositions

This is the sixth and final part of our series on the scientific basis for evolution, refuting lies from creationists.

There is now a companion book to this series: http://www.amazon.com/How-Evolution-Scientific-Shane-Killian/dp/0557219965/re...

This series is now available on DVD and Blu-Ray! The DVD contains full NTSC-resolution versions, and the Blu-Ray disc contains full 720p-resolution versions of all six videos, and includes English subtitles. It also includes other freely-available videos referenced in the series, including three from cdk007, a video I made about Piltdown Man, and the clip of students doing a rather stupid protest of evolution.

DVD: http://www.lulu.com/content/digital-video-disc/how-evolution-is-scientific---...

Blu-Ray: http://www.lulu.com/content/digital-video-disc/how-evolution-is-scientific---...

Category:

Education

Tags:

• science
• creation
• evolution
• darwin
• criticism
• atheist
• atheists
• expelled
• richard
• dawkins
• pz
• myers
• eugenie
• scott
• kenneth
• miller

[shanedk]

@daogdaog "People could not find transistional forms"

There are THOUSANDS.

"so they fabricated a piltdown man and fooled the world for more than 40 years."

No, they didn't. NO scientists outside of England were fooled. See my video on the subject.

"In recent years, a chinese attempted to glue fossilized bird head with a dino hind legs."

Covered in the VERY VIDEO YOU'RE COMMENTING ON.

I swear, creationists...

[XxI3ioHazardxX]

Your series needs to be shown in schools.

[davewatcher]

Arguably, there is 'intelligent design' in humans but only insofar as that we helped design ourselves.

[shanedk]

@daogdaog No, IDIOT, it just means that its branch hung around longer before going extinct. And if you'd bother to do research on how evolution REALLY works, you'd see that's a CONFIRMATION and not a falsification! But you won't, because you've shown quite clearly you're not here to learn and understand. You're here to tell whatever LIE you can to try and make evolution wrong, all to support your pathetic bronze-age world-view.

[daogdaog]

@shanedk Dont rely too much on wikipedia. It wont give you much about evolution of giraffe and when Climacoceras first existed. Evolutionist biologists have found out from research that Samotherium existed before Climacoceras. Okapi, the giraffe relative, existed before both Climacoceras and Samotherium. So evolution is totally wrong because the supposed descendant Samotherium 3m which looked almost a giraffe would have to evolve to its ancestor the deer-like Climacoceras 1.5m.

[shanedk]

@daogdaog See, here's the thing: if you were GENUINELY interested in the answer to this question, you'd just look it up, and learn about how giraffes and okapis evolved from Climacoceras via Palaeotragus and Samotherium in the Miocene.

But no, you present the question on a YouTube page as though the mere fact that you asked the question means there's no answer and it's "magical." You do NOT want to know. You only want to sneer your smug, self-righteous delusions on others.

[daogdaog]

@shanedk Giraffe is the iconic example evolution written in millions of biology textbooks. Which series of animals that evolved in incremental steps and eventually transformed into a giraffe starting from the earliest known giraffid? From a short necked four legged ancestor 1.5m animal to a 5.5m to 6m giraffe is just magical.

[shanedk]

@daogdaog Okay, go ahead.

[daogdaog]

@LoricaLady I am just commenting here to show to all evolutionists out there that science and simple logic will show that evolution is flawed.

[LoricaLady]

@daogdaog Thank you. Actually I sent you that post by mistake. Sorry.