Seeing Spin 2 Symmetry in GEM, a Unified Field Theory

This 15 minute APS talk explains GEM, my unified field theory for gravity and EM, as a variation on EM, our most successful field theory. A particular problem is discussed, seeing spin 2 symmetry in the vector coupling term. Feynman in his Lectures on gravity, chapter 3, shows how a coupling coupling term has spin 1 symmetry. I show how a simple twist of the two currents leads to a spin 2 symmetry, so like charges can attract, as they do for gravity.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Physics
• Unified
• Field
• Theory
• UFT
• Spin
• Coupling

[007wingman]

Hi, spin is not the only thing going on in a particle , atom or in a electron. When applying a force to a spinning mass the outcome will always be some form of precession depending on where the force or energy transfer was applied. Precession is the fundamental motion and with frequency of application will circle the applying force. 007Wingman.

[sweetser]

Hi:

I hope my video did not claim spin was the only thing going on. Spotting a spin 2 symmetry in the current coupling term took me more than a year to refine. If one uses standard vectors, it cannot be done. I had to use hypercomplex numbers. As important as precession happens to be, it is a different issue.

[5thwheelman]

Lots of information in your thinking. Good stuff! However, the Unified Field Theory has to show not only what the weak force is and its relationship to EM, GAV, and the strong force, but show why the relationship between EM and GAV causes a difference in force between them explaining why EM is a much greater force than GAV. It is a machine that must be described. It is very simple, and I can see you might pick this up better than most and be able to add to it, the only game in town now.....

[sweetser]

It sounds like you are referring to the Hierarchy problem. My work has yet to address that issue. Until I have an equation that relates to a specific problem, I will just nod and say, "Yup, that is a problem".

[urlborg]

THEN- trying vainly to stuff it into some couple of axis in a local finite Maxwell problem, as if it were just another kind of TV show broadcast! An arc-radian is still just a morphed excuse for a signed axis guys! This is an intellectual gimbal lock! The negative axis-range that the dimensionality of gravitation repels is this displacing-only nonexistent 'emptiness non-stuff'.....

[urlborg]

to me the whole problem is rooted in the false assumption that you can just take the transcendental universally attractively creative master dimensional entity that is the antecedent causality of all existence of and in the Union of All Love Itself and treat this most invincible and faster than light reality of all being and just call it some weak force ,'field'!

[Jinstack]

Well put. I am studying physics at the moment and this was very easy to understand.

[Ulises2357]

El spin 1 en una particula seria que tiene que dar toda una vuelta para verse =, mientras que el spin 2 quiere desir que tiene que dar media vuelta, spin 1/2 quiere desir que tiene que dar mas de una vuelta... no se si es lo que dise aca pero me parese que era la def.