Media and Public Shut out of Election Debate at NYU -- Outrageous !!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
482 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 13, 2009

First City Council Debate among Candidates for Democratic Primary in the 3rd District Race. Debate facility owned and operated by: New York University (19 West 4th Street).

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wires/2009/08/13/public-press-barred-from-_ws_2...
http://www.cityhallnews.com/news/132/ARTICLE/2075/2009-08-13.html
http://bloombergwatch.com/?p=1523
http://www.christinequinn.com/content/media-and-public-shut-out-election-deba...

An over-flow crowd formed outside one of NYU's buildings. Because the venue was so small, and only 5 press passes were issued to cover the re-election of the Speaker of the City Council (this, in a city of over 8 million people), there were more interested people who wanted to get in -- but who were turned away by NYU. At least 2 journalists with media credentials, at least one other freelance reporter, and a long line of undecided voters of Hells Kitchen, Chelsea, and the West Village looked on in complete helplessness as NYU officials turned them away.

This is NOT what democracy looks like !

After several conversations, candidate for NYC Public Advocate Norman Siegel was able to persuade and influence NYU officials to allow a handicapped man in a wheelchair access to attend the debate. But the 3 other reporters, and the rest of the voters, were turned away.

It took the persuasive skills of Mr. Siegel and the video recording by several citizen reporters for NYU to make room for the handicapped man. In essence, you need on your side a mob with at least one brilliant legal mind to change the minds of closed minded public institutions.

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (astoria25)

  • Shame on NYU ! This is an outrage !!! What kind of contribution are they making to this city if they are turning away citizens from a public debate ? They are oppressing the media's first amendment rights, and the voters' rights to participating in their own democratic government ! Oops, I forgot, this is the same university that wanted to hire Dr. Li-Ann Thio to teach human rights.

see all

All Comments (1)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Initially, I, too, was scared of NYPD going in, but now I realise that it was NYU and The Villager newspaper that ran us over; they were the ones that metaphorically tasered us to the ground. Notice how when I confront them with the fact that only 5 media were allowed in, how the NYU officials ran from us. They can't stand it that we were armed with facts ! The truth hurts, doesn't it NYU !? This is a black-eye on your reputation, and I hope everybody watches these videos.

  • Closing the doors to the democratic process that will determine who our democratically-elected leaders will be -- is undemocratic -- it's unpatriotic. How can a university claim it is for freedom of thought, when it squashes the public's right to attend electoral debates ? Oh, I forgot, this is the same university that wanted to hire Dr. Li-Ann Thio to teach human rights.

  • Norman Siegel is the People's lawyer

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more