NBA Finals 2008:LA Lakers VS Boston Celtics Game 5
Top Comments
All Comments (42)
-
@AkbarDwn0722 ya but lakers were swept
-
@t2nvanphuc lakers owned them in game 6 and 7. Both by double figures. There are better than Celtics, period.
-
@29Felipe yea the lakers are soooo bad...16 championships..they rlly suck dont they...smh
-
@allnurmouth408 i just hope both teams will get back to the final this year. Lakers and celtics have played without their starting lineup back in 2008 and 2010..
-
LAKERS SUCKS
NBA 12 FINALS CELTICS X LAKERS
9 VICTORY CELTICS
-
@skyblue5914 boston sucks? you must be a fucking ignorant
-
@t2nvanphuc celtics could win the title but celtics play without perkin, he is not a offensive player but is so defensive and he could put atleast 8 points and is a good defender and a hard worker!!!
-
Wow no Ariza or Bynum, theres no way they'd be able to win it with out them that year can't believe BOTH got injured... sucks.
as for the celtics no more eddie house for those sweat 3's nd james posey, sory but da bench waz really good nd there is no way rasheed or robinson are playing as gud ..ima lakers fan bt i realy just hope its a well fought final but in the end lakers taking it ..LAKERS 2010 NBA CHAMPS SWEET REVENGE
allnurmouth408 1 year ago 4
you r all jealous about LA.... lakers beat celtics last year, and all about losing for LA againts celtics was a long time ago, but right now LA is a better team, and 2011 LA lost to the NBA champion MAVS, not like celtics lost to heat who lost to mavs
AkbarDwn0722 7 months ago