Stabilization comparison
Loading...
1,285
Uploader Comments (StillFramePictures)
see all
All Comments (7)
-
Wow that's an amazing difference.
-
i'm really tired of crummy looking re-samples (blurry /pre-deinterlace) Anybody know of a good deinterlace that WON'T blur video? Every one that i know of is just throwing away half the vertical resolution. I really liked the examples of the MSU (moscow) deinterlace filter, but they sold it to samsung and i can't find it anywhere now.
-
Wow, ur really great at editing. Im working with Sony Vegas now. I agree with FinalDraftFilms, the gunshot test #2 was really awesome (looked realistic).
-
Wow, I favorited this. Really like the gunshot test #2 video.
Loading...
see Motion 3 is good for stabilization, But with a Glidecam you get Flow, it makes video look like there is no operator at all. its suppose to feel like your actually there. your footage does look good though. Another great program for fixing small things like this is the program After Effects if you can afford it. Plus there is way way more things you can do in after Effects then in motion.
MyOriginalHumor 2 years ago
Very true. Though, I have learned that if you want to be professional, you have to learn Shake, Nuke, and Maya for effects and compositing. AE is a Pro-Sumer effects program rarely used by true professionals. If you apply for a job at a visual effects company, those are the programs they ask if you are proficient in. Since Shake is no longer for sale, my belief is that Motion will develop into what Shake was as newer versions are released. So, I'm learning both.
StillFramePictures 2 years ago
it does looks good. but i think u loosing some pixels and detail maybe?
ngothyeaun 4 years ago
It only looses detail because it is slightly zoomed in to crop the edges. The distortion is mostly YouTube compression.
StillFramePictures 4 years ago