Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Global Warming. Part 3 - Man-made or natural? (1of2)

Global Warming. Part 3 - Man-made or natural (1of2) In this video speaks Richard S. Lindzen, Charles D. Keeling, Richard C. J. Somerville, Pieter Tans. This video is the part of PBS documentary ...  
 
Customize

More From: starrdreams

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

This is a video response to Global Warming. Part 2 - Climates of the past
Ratings disabled
3,157 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (2)

Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (27)   Options

Loading...
ethnomagicacious (1 day ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
The "demonstration" at 9 minutes is completely irrelevant. Since they acknowledge only minutes before that the CO2 makes up very little of the atmosphere, how does showing that 100% CO2 blocks all heat from escaping have anything to do with the GW argument? If you fill the atmosphere with methane - much more predominant than CO2 - very bad things would happen, too. But so what? There's absolutely no way CO2 could ever become the dominant greenhouse gas, no matter what we do. So stupid.
starrdreams (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
@acx1n9s Look at the bigger scale and you will find that it is not cooling at all.
seaplaneguy1 (1 month ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
This video is nonsense. Venus? Mars? Should they be the same temp as Earth? Hell no!!!! Different orbits, water, etc, etc. ^10000 power...Insane video.
What a bunch of crap. It fades because of Height to extinction. All Co2 does when added is to lower the height to extinction...now at 375 ppm it is about 10 meters on earth.... Wake up people you are being lied to. CO2 is in saturation!!!!!  CO2 is food for plants.
starrdreams (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
@seaplaneguy1 So CO2 is good, yes? More CO2 better for us? :)
seaplaneguy1 (1 month ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Keeling is central to this GW hoax. Yah, put it on a mountain top...that was a volcano...ah...sounds like his measurements need to take into account the co2 from the mountain...just saying. There is NO greenhouse effect. It is convective and conductive. 0F? Nonsense... Google Georg Beck 180 years of CO2... Keeling is not right...
starrdreams (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
@seaplaneguy1 If there no greenhouse effect then there would be constant winter on the Earth.
seaplaneguy1 (1 day ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
What is the height to extinction for CO2 at 375 ppm? Ans. About 10 meters (33 ft). If you double co2 to 750 that height drops to 9.7 m (32 ft). Is ONE FOOT drop going to make much difference? Absolutely NO!!!!!! Wake up.
The reason a greenhouse gets hot is because the glass blocks conduction and convection. Earth is NOT a greenhouse.
The "greenhouse effect" is not correctly named, so it does not exist.
Last, your statement shows you don't understand anything about what is happening.
seaplaneguy1 (1 day ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Starrdreams,
You said ..."no greenhouse...constant winter"
In your mind, adding greenhouse gasses, like water, makes a blanket...false idea.

As I stated, more just lowers the height to extinction, to does NOT trap more.
Think of it like a water filter. Run dirty water in a filter that is low density...clean in 10 ft. Increase filter density....clean in 5 ft...and so on. Very Very high density...clean in 1 inch. As soon as the water is clean, rest of filter not used. Same with co2...
johammbass (1 month ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Bullshit.
When the earth's temperature increases the outgoing radiation also increases.
Yet another fucking religion.
starrdreams (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
@johammbass Is it confirmed by scientific research?

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.