Gregory Chaitin Lecture Lisbon University 2004 Pt 8
Loading...
Loading...
2,253
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 1:18:48Life as Evolving Software, Greg Chaitin at PPGC...by PPGCInfUFRGS1,295 views
- 1:48Hitler tries to prove The Riemann Hypothesisby nietzscheprime6,510 views
- 9:01Gregory Chaitin Lecture Mälardalen University 2...by pont6603,111 views
- 9:01Gregory Chaitin Lecture Lisbon University 2004 ...by pont6602,872 views
- 9:01Gregory Chaitin Lecture Mälardalen University 2...by pont6605,056 views
- 9:01Gregory Chaitin Lecture Mälardalen University 2...by pont6603,247 views
- 1:29:14Conhecimento Perigosoby ikeshimada13,333 views
- 9:01Gregory Chaitin Lecture Lisbon University 2004 ...by pont6603,911 views
- 9:01Gregory Chaitin Lecture Lisbon University 2004 ...by pont66011,605 views
- 14:01(1/8) Greg Chaitin: "Hacia una teoría matemátic...by ISCVtalk810 views
- 9:01Gregory Chaitin Lecture Lisbon University 2004 ...by pont6606,831 views
- 9:18The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See (part ...by wonderingmind423,872,678 views
- 7:08Series 7 Online Exam Training - Part Iby SecuritiesInstitute8,078 views
- 1:41:52The Limitation of Mental and Physical Realityby philoctetesctr2,717 views
- 5:55Paul Cohen part 6 of 6, Gödel Centennial, Viennaby ericcohen9111,971 views
- 8:59Gregory Chaitin Lecture Lisbon University 2004 ...by pont6602,306 views
- 4:32Gregory Chaitin Lecture Lisbon University 2004 ...by pont6602,264 views
- 9:02Gregory Chaitin Lecture Mälardalen University 2...by pont6604,009 views
- 7:56Gregory Chaitin Lecture Mälardalen University 2...by pont6603,811 views
- 9:01Gregory Chaitin Lecture Lisbon University 2004 ...by pont6603,249 views
"why isn't there any air in this room..." he is gasping....
stargen5 1 year ago
I do not want to hear name calling. Give me your understanding. For now I assume the math is a substitute for religion. Both designed to model, not explain.
f00kumofo123 2 years ago
I really don't think you understand the concepts Chaitin is presenting...
Entertainmentwf 2 years ago
I'm guessing you've never heard of recursion theory... You don't need no intelligent entity to do anything. Good example: Genetic algorithms which can generate more and more
'complicated' solutions and computations from simpler ones..
Of course numbers are a convention but, you got to remember computation is the best direction we have... Of course that is your opinion but, it really kind of defeats the purpose since you are supposing something Godel, Turing, and even Chaitin showed wrong.
Entertainmentwf 2 years ago
IMHO, this theory is based on inherently wrong assumptions that numbers are universal concept. Numbers are human invention. To correctly model this universe, you will need to include intelligent entity into that model that will invent their concept of calculation and eventually build an iteration of their model of universe and so on.
This riddle is essentially an infinite loop theory that proves humans cannot build such a model.
f00kumofo123 4 years ago
Precision increases with time pass. Isn't it true to state that universe lives up to match human demands at any time. So if tomorrows precision demand is let's say 1000000 decimal places, can it be that the hypercomputer that runs universe is scaled to match that demand?
f00kumofo123 4 years ago
what a funny theory. Quite interesting to watch him. But he's too atomistic, Democrit. Of course quantum mechanics is right and the Universe is not deterministic.
KatAngelaRebel 4 years ago