Cosmic Rays Mystery Solved - Sixty Symbols
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Published on Feb 19, 2013
New observations seem to settle the question of where cosmic rays come from.
Dr Tony Padilla discusses the research. See the paper at: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1302.3307v1.pdf
COMMENT FROM TONY: "My comments at 1.30 were a bit hasty. Cosmic rays do not pass through the earth. Most collide in the upper atmosphere. I was actually thinking of the LHC safety debate. If they exist, mini blackholes produced by cosmic ray collisions on earth would slip straight through because the earth isn't dense enough. But not the protons themselves."
Tony tweets at https://twitter.com/DrTonyPadilla (lots of good science news, links and jokes mixed with some over emotional football commentary)
Nasa write-up at: http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2013/...
Visit our website at http://www.sixtysymbols.com/
We're on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/sixtysymbols
And Twitter at http://twitter.com/#!/periodicvideos
This project features scientists from The University of Nottingham
http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/physics/i...
Sixty Symbols videos by Brady Haran
A run-down of Brady's channels:
http://periodicvideos.blogspot.co.uk/...
-
Category
-
License
Standard YouTube License
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
-
9:30
Why is Stephen Hawking a big deal? - Sixty Symbolsby Sixty SymbolsFeatured
171,626
-
14:07
Quantum Mechanics (an embarrassment) - Sixty Symbolsby Sixty Symbols
181,452 views
-
7:27
Type II Supernova - Sixty Symbolsby Sixty Symbols
53,853 views
-
8:44
Problems with High School Physics - Sixty Symbolsby Sixty Symbols
237,455 views
-
4:10
Spinning Magnet - Sixty Symbolsby Sixty Symbols
168,199 views
-
6:56
de Broglie Waves - Sixty Symbolsby Sixty Symbols
99,461 views
-
5:30
Watching paint dry - Sixty Symbolsby Sixty Symbols
81,370 views
-
11:53
Answers (Part One) - Sixty Symbolsby Sixty Symbols
103,840 views
-
6:31
100% Homemade Electricity Producing Wind Turbineby HomemadeWindTurbine
629,072 views
-
1:04:01
"The World in 2030" by Dr. Michio Kakuby CUNYQueensborough
2,331,243 views
-
5:51
Atom Bombs and Dimensional Analysis - Sixty Symbolsby sixtysymbols
158,367 views
-
5:01
Speed of Light - Sixty Symbolsby sixtysymbols
195,266 views
-
12:45
Higgs Boson - Sixty Symbolsby Sixty Symbols
89,475 views
-
5:27
Career Advice - Gordon Ramsayby Adam Smith College
116,161 views
-
2:51
Human AIR BAGS -- Weirdos Of The Month #12by Vsauce2
934,694 views
-
7:38
Jim Jefferies: Fully Functionalby EdFestMagTV
65,957 views
-
2:44
Hand back into the Large Hadron Collider - Sixty Symbolsby sixtysymbols
347,158 views
-
10:20
FIFA 13 | Pro Clubs | Journey to Division One #1by Dat Black Guy
838,874 views
-
10:23
150 Warheads Challenge-WORLD RECORDby L.A. BEAST- SaVaGe NaTiOn
395,540 views
-
15:00
"Battle of Narendra III" - Old Versionby VideoSpaceFX
347,941 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Top Comments
JKJonesInCode 2 months ago
"So we're gonna throw our hands in the air and say we're never gonna know?" "No of course we don't do that!" *Awkward silence in the Quantum Physicist community*
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
AutoPsychotic 2 months ago
Clearly you weren't paying any attention to the video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
All Comments (425)
Mark Robins 12 hours ago
yes because acceleration has velocity in it. 
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
b0bthekillar 4 days ago
there's always one
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
SherwinGooch 1 week ago
That's very interesting. Although inverted with respect to temperature, it's reminiscent of a patent of Tesla's. He patented a motor based on Currie point. His model (in the days when a patent actually had to work) consisted of a candle which heated an iron magnet on a spring which, when it was cool, was attracted to a stationary piece of iron. This attraction pulled it over the flame. When its temperature reached the Currie point, it sprang out of the flame and cooled: Mechanical oscillator.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
SherwinGooch 1 week ago
Since primary cosmic rays are primarily positively charged, it is difficult for me to understand how interstellar space may be charge neutral. Is there a simple explanation for how this can be? Or does this mean that the aggregate charge of supernovae is negative?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
dave rowbotham 1 month ago
Enough of them interact.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
felipe970421 1 month ago
LHC: Little metal thing on earth
Supernova: Huge explosion the size of 10^(big number) suns
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube