YouTube home Comedy Week on YouTube
Upload

Cosmic Rays Mystery Solved - Sixty Symbols

sixtysymbols sixtysymbols·210 videos
243,427
90,066
Like     Dislike 9

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like sixtysymbols's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike sixtysymbols's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add sixtysymbols's video to your playlist.

Published on Feb 19, 2013

New observations seem to settle the question of where cosmic rays come from.

Dr Tony Padilla discusses the research. See the paper at: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1302.3307v1.pdf

COMMENT FROM TONY: "My comments at 1.30 were a bit hasty. Cosmic rays do not pass through the earth. Most collide in the upper atmosphere. I was actually thinking of the LHC safety debate. If they exist, mini blackholes produced by cosmic ray collisions on earth would slip straight through because the earth isn't dense enough. But not the protons themselves."

Tony tweets at https://twitter.com/DrTonyPadilla (lots of good science news, links and jokes mixed with some over emotional football commentary)

Nasa write-up at: http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2013/...

Visit our website at http://www.sixtysymbols.com/
We're on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/sixtysymbols
And Twitter at http://twitter.com/#!/periodicvideos
This project features scientists from The University of Nottingham
http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/physics/i...

Sixty Symbols videos by Brady Haran

A run-down of Brady's channels:
http://periodicvideos.blogspot.co.uk/...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Top Comments

  • JKJonesInCode

    "So we're gonna throw our hands in the air and say we're never gonna know?" "No of course we don't do that!" *Awkward silence in the Quantum Physicist community*

    · 31

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate JKJonesInCode's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate JKJonesInCode's comment.
  • AutoPsychotic

    Clearly you weren't paying any attention to the video.

    · 17

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate AutoPsychotic's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate AutoPsychotic's comment.
    in reply to srgarathnor (Show the comment)

All Comments (425)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • Mark Robins

    yes because acceleration has velocity in it. 

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Mark Robins's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Mark Robins's comment.
    in reply to Nick Leijenhorst (Show the comment)
  • b0bthekillar

    there's always one

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate b0bthekillar's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate b0bthekillar's comment.
    in reply to AutoPsychotic (Show the comment)
  • SherwinGooch

    That's very interesting. Although inverted with respect to temperature, it's reminiscent of a patent of Tesla's. He patented a motor based on Currie point. His model (in the days when a patent actually had to work) consisted of a candle which heated an iron magnet on a spring which, when it was cool, was attracted to a stationary piece of iron. This attraction pulled it over the flame. When its temperature reached the Currie point, it sprang out of the flame and cooled: Mechanical oscillator.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate SherwinGooch's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate SherwinGooch's comment.
    in reply to Hematite1000 (Show the comment)
  • SherwinGooch

    Since primary cosmic rays are primarily positively charged, it is difficult for me to understand how interstellar space may be charge neutral. Is there a simple explanation for how this can be? Or does this mean that the aggregate charge of supernovae is negative?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate SherwinGooch's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate SherwinGooch's comment.
  • dave rowbotham

    Enough of them interact.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate dave rowbotham's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate dave rowbotham's comment.
    in reply to SusFerrum (Show the comment)
  • felipe970421

    LHC: Little metal thing on earth

    Supernova: Huge explosion the size of 10^(big number) suns

    · 2

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate felipe970421's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate felipe970421's comment.
    in reply to Nick Leijenhorst (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Advertisement
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later