The 9/11 Scam

The 9/11 scam.

WAKE UP SILENT MAJORITY!!!!!!!

music:
abolish government by TSOL

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11
• nine
• eleven
• scam
• george
• bush
• abolish
• government
• TSOL
• larry
• silverstein
• sucks

[1NWOMD]

911 was a heist plain and simple!!!! $Trillions in gold was stolen from the vaults in the basement + $Trillions stolen in illegal wire transfers/insider trading. To cover up their tracks, they demolished the condemned Asbestos filled trade towers and they "pulled" their building 7 command center. Then guess what?? Silverstein was awarded 3 $billion in a record insurance claim that he took out just months before making absolutely sure to cover "acts of terrorism".

[gunnsforkids]

you said it all man, thanks for posting the info.

[madpaintbalerx]

I'll stop, because I can see you don't give a shit about anything.

[theJchannel]

how fucking dare you

do you have any bloody idea what my countrys been through???

yea every fuckin day a soldiers dead

kids bein blown up in buses

your hometown being bombed

get a fucking life, you have no clue what growin up in a country were you can't walk in the streets incase of bombs. bloody morron. evil fucker

[sssssjjjj1]

@ihatebobsaget1989 You are a disgrace. You are a complete moron. I bet your kids are morons and your parents are morons. You are beyond stupid.

[12astile]

america land of the free, to the people with the power and the guns

[ihatebobsaget1989]

Where we do think people really oversell this quote is in portaying it as some spookily accurate piece of foreknowledge, that the New Pearl Harbour was to justify regime change, war in Iraq or elsewhere in the Middle East. That really is a step too far, as youll find out if you download "Rebuilding America's Defenses" and read if for yourself.

[ihatebobsaget1989]

9/11 undoubtedly revealed failings in intelligence and response on the day, but nothing that matches the PNACs agenda. Theres no military technology fix that would have prevented it.

[ihatebobsaget1989]

The use of Pearl Harbour here means "a form of attack which we don't have the technology to counter", which now lets us make more sense of the first quote. All they're saying is that "the process of updating the US military will take a long time, unless the problems are made apparent by an attack that reveals our technical failings".

[ihatebobsaget1989]

"Absent a rigorous program of experimentation to investigate the nature of the revolution in military affairs as it applies to war at sea, the Navy might face a future Pearl Harbor as unprepared for war in the post-carrier era as it was unprepared for war at the dawn of the carrier age".

[ihatebobsaget1989]

So how did 9/11 make Levin look wrong, and the Bush administration right?Back to the PNAC, where there's still the "Pearl Harbor" aspect. What did they mean by that? We can get an indication from the one other sentence in the document that uses the phrase...

[ihatebobsaget1989]

Some elected officials got the message. Sen. Carl Levin told Rumsfeld at a June 2001 hearing that we were lavishing money on missile defense and not "putting enough emphasis on countering the most likely threats to our national security ... like terrorist attacks."

[ihatebobsaget1989]

Now, its certainly true that Bush had continued to fund it, and with significant budget increases immediately post 9/11, but who says he wouldnt have done so anyway? The reality is that the attacks themselves only give ammunition to hjs critics. And some of them had it immediately:

[ihatebobsaget1989]

So "transformation" refers to the process of introducing more information technologies into the military. What does 9/11 have to do with that? Nothing at all. In fact, the attacks demonstrated that one of the PNAC's pet schemes, a global missile shield, is entirely useless when planes can become bombs.