Hello Rude Atheist -Dr Zakir Naik.

Evolution Quotes

"The number of intermediate varieties which have formerly existed on earth must be truly enormous. Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory." - Charles Darwin 1902 edition.

"...I am quite conscious that my speculations run beyond the bounds of true science....It is a mere rag of an hypothesis with as many flaw[s] & holes as sound parts." Charles Darwin to Asa Gray, cited by Adrian Desmond and James Moore, Darwin, (New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1991) pp. 456, 475.

"Nowhere was Darwin able to point to one bona fide case of natural selection having actually generated evolutionary change in nature....Ultimately, the Darwinian theory of evolution is no more nor less than the great cosmogenic myth of the twentieth century." Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crises (Bethesda, Maryland: Adler & Adler, 1986) pp. 62, 358.

"I believe that one day the Darwinian myth will be ranked the greatest deceit in the history of science." Søren Løvtrup, Darwinism: The Refutation of a Myth (New York: Croom Helm, 1987), p. 422.

"Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever. In explaining evolution, we do not have one iota of fact." Dr. T. N. Tahmisian Evolution and the Emperor's New Clothes by N.J. Mitchell (United Kingdom: Roydon Publications, 1983), title page.

"The Darwinian theory of descent has not a single fact to confirm it in the realm of nature. It is not the result of scientific research, but purely the product of imagination." Albert Fleischmann. Witnesses Against Evolution by John Fred Meldau (Denver: Christian Victory Publishing, 1968), p. 13.

"[T]he theory suffers from grave defects, which are becoming more and more apparent as time advances. It can no longer square with practical scientific knowledge, nor does it suffice for our theoretical grasp of the facts...No one can demonstrate that the limits of a species have ever been passed. These are the Rubicons which evolutionists cannot cross...Darwin ransacked other spheres of practical research work for ideas...But his whole resulting scheme remains, to this day, foreign to scientifically established zoology, since actual changes of species by such means are still unknown." Albert Fleischmann, "The Doctrine of Organic Evolution in the Light of Modern Research," Journal of the Transactions of the Victoria Institute 65 (1933): pp. 194-95, 205-6, 208-9.

"Evolutionism is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless." Louis Bounoure. The Advocate, 8 March 1984, p. 17.

"And the salient fact is this: if by evolution we mean macroevolution (as we henceforth shall), then it can be said with the utmost rigor that the doctrine is totally bereft of scientific sanction. Now, to be sure, given the multitude of extravagant claims about evolution promulgated by evolutionists with an air of scientific infallibility, this may indeed sound strange. And yet the fact remains that there exists to this day not a shred of bona fide scientific evidence in support of the thesis that macroevolutionary transformations have ever occurred." Wolfgang Smith, Teilhardism and the New Religion (Rockford., Ill.: Tan Books, 1988), pp. 5-6. Dr. Smith, taught at MIT and UCLA.

"With the failure of these many efforts, science was left in the somewhat embarrassing position of having to postulate theories of living origins which it could not demonstrate. After having chided the theologian for his reliance on myth and miracle, science found itself in the inevitable position of having to create a mythology of its own: namely, the assumption that what, after long effort could not prove to take place today had, in truth, taken place in the primeval past." Loren Eisley, The Immense Journey (1957), p. 199.

"If complex organisms ever did evolve from simpler ones, the process took place contrary to the laws of nature, and must have involved what may rightly be termed the miraculous." R.E.D. Clark, Victoria Institute (1943), p.

" `Creation,' in the ordinary sense of the word, is perfectly conceivable. I find no difficulty in conceiving that, at some former period, this universe was not in existence, and that it made its appearance in six days (or instantaneously, if that is preferred), in consequence of the volition of some preexisting Being. Then, as now, the so-called a priori arguments against Theism and, given a Deity, against the possibility of creative acts, appeared to me to be devoid of reasonable foundation." Thomas H. Huxley, quoted in *L. Huxley, Life and Letters of Thomas Henry Huxley, Vol. I (1903), p. 241 (1903). 63.

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

• 'Alawite
• Black
• Muslims
• Ahl
• al-kitab
• allahv
• akbar
• hadith
• Mecca
• Isa
• Ka'aba
• Mustafa
• Rabb
• Sharia
• laws
• Sunni
• Shi'ite
• Bukhari
• Jihad
• sufi
• ramadan
• fard
• fatwa
• hafiz
• imam
• iman
• jinn
• jizya
• khalifah
• kitab
• rakat
• salaat
• sunnah
• tawhid
• Christian
• Apologist
• Polemics
• Argumentation
• Debate
• Debating
• Jamal
• Badawi
• Tark
• El
• Nimir
• Shabir
• Ally
• Islamic
• dawah
• centre
• rebuttals
• Zakir
• Naik
• Nadir
• Ahmed
• Walter
• Martin
• Dave
• Hunt
• Koran
• prophet
• quran
• Ravi
• Zacharias
• Farrakhan
• Ergun
• Caner
• Elijah
• Muhammad
• Wahabis
• Persians

[LampPlaceThing]

[Christian speaking] Do you need God? When you do... do what I did and look at all the atheist and their false confidence. To be satisfied with death, loss, and instability? I am not a christian who refuses "evidence" but I refuse chaos, and insanity!

[rumell32]

@LampPlaceThing Joseph Stalin, Atheist: 20 million plus dead

Mao-Tse-Tung, Atheist: 40 million plus dead

Adolf Hitler, Atheist: 10 million plus dead

Pol Pot, Atheist: 2 million dead

Kim-Il-Sung, Atheist: 5 million dead

Fidel Castro, Atheist: 1 million dead

Maximilien Robespierre, father of secular France, Atheist: 40,000 d

Joseph Stalin, Communist: 20 million plus dead

Mao-Tse-Tung, Communist: 40 million plus dead

[9t5Gina2k7]

Wrong, Atheism isn't a belief in science, it's a rejection of deities.

[megustaverlas]

@rumell32 Adolf Hitler was not an atheist, idiot, he was a Christian.

[tdweomer]

The first evolution "quote" you have says "Charles Darwin 1902 edition". Since Charles Darwin DIED in 1882 I guess the "1902 edition" of Charles Darwin is, like, the upgrade? Goodbye "DarWindows Vista" hello "DarWindows 7"? Lol you can't even lie well. Everyone should go to "talkorigins org" and read why all of this is complete garbage.

[TheAnimeStreamer]

fucking wikipedia...

[teched246]

Reptillian worshippers

[alqammd]

Noor is means light not reflected light

[megustaverlas]

@9t5Gina2k7 right on!

[9t5Gina2k7]

@LampPlaceThing being atheist doesn't make you a idiot, and doesn't cause you to do bad things, it simply means you reject all deities, so technically, you are nearly an atheist, seen as you do not believe in Allah or Zeus etc. Plus, you can write all the chaos of people who may have been atheist, but in all fairness, these people weren't fighting in the name of Atheism, where as most people fighting who are religious are fighting in the name of a God.

[Pouyan87]

@YngJey no it certainly doesnt disprove the existence of god. But if he does exist, it does prove that he is unjust, unforgiving, a vindictive bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser, genocidal, filicidal, sadomasochistic and a capriciously malevolent douche.

[ThinkToFreedom]

Why don't you argue against their arguments like all the contradictions, intolerance, and absurdities of the Quran instead of just making a stupid "guilt by association" argument? Like the talking ants for instance?