Jon Stewart v. Newt Gingrich daily show

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,593
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Ratings have been disabled for this video.

Uploaded by on May 20, 2009

This video isn't to discuss Newt's policies. It's for the rationality of Stewart's responses.

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (miggetymike1)

  • Let me get this straight, you support New Gingrich (a known liar in his own right) who basically disappeared for 8 years while the Bush administration destroyed our coutry with wars that lined the pockets of the uber-rich. The only reason Gingrich is out now is he has presidential aspirations. I will never vote for this cockaroach!

  • Every aspect of your post is either false or irrelevent to the video. I am NOT a Gingrich supporter. The point of this video is clear: to point out the logical fallacies of Stewart's arguments. If you have any intelligible thoughts about that I'd love to hear them.

  • @miggetymike1 I get the point that you were being hard on Jon Stwart (the comedian), but you said none of my points were true or relevent to the discussion: (1) Let me get this straight, you support Newt Gingrich ... You basically railed against Jon stewart in support of Newt Gingrich in both your points (2) New Gingrich (a known liar in his own right). He lied about Sonia Sotomayor, Obama being a radical.

  • I don't know how I could have been more clear when I said I was "NOT a Gingrich supporter." Once again your personal views on Gingrich are irrelevant to whether or not Stewart's arguments were valid. It doesn't matter if Stewart was trying to use the faulty logic on Osama, it's still faulty logic and I wouldn't be supporting Osama for pointing that out.

  • Warren Buffet a really rich guy...."Mr Buffett said that he was taxed at 17.7 per cent on the $46 million he made last year, without trying to avoid paying higher taxes, while his secretary, who earned $60,000, was taxed at 30 per cent.

  • I've heard this. I find it hard to believe that Buffet's personal secretary only makes $60k. Even if these numbers are true the exeption doesn't disprove the rule. Pointing out that one girl is taller than one boy does nothing to disprove that on average boys are taller. The fact remains, rich people, on average, pay not only more money but a larger percent of their income in taxes. This has never been a secret, the IRS keeps records you can look up.

Top Comments

  • You have been watching way to much of the O'Riley Factor.....And besides you give a flying F!@# what Jon says he is a comedian thats what they do make people laugh at poking fun at everybody else...

  • I think you are missing Stewart's point here. Stewart believes that healthcare is clearly broken, which, I think most americans woud agree. So, if private business can't make it work, why not let the government give it a try. Competent governments are good at waging war (The first Gulf War!) As for the houses, I don't hear people complaining about the houses they purchase. However, I do hear a lot of complaints about medical insurance people purchase.

see all

All Comments (95)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @miggetymike1 The rich pay a larger percentage on income tax from regular income, like if their selling a product they would pay a larger percentage of tax on the profits. But from interest on investments they only pay around 15 percent which is a lot lower than what somebody making 60,000 a year would make which is close to 30. Warren Buffet makes all or most his money off investments so he is paying around the 17.7 number he quoted.

  • NDAA.. Obama not tyrannical? But Jon Stewart's argument's are illogical at times certainly.

  • Can't wait to hear Stewart about Newt's ideas of arresting judges.

    That nutcase wants to be a Fuhrer ... LOL

  • Jon Stewart is a dick

  • You’re right the fault of a tow party system is that some people may think differently and or point out something negative about you. I guess you’re right maybe we should just have a dictator and an inquisition to find and kill anybody that may have different views than us.

  • the rationality is Jon is trying to get laughs and is not a real journalist. even though he reports news better and more truthfully than "actual ' journalists

  • @miggetymike1 I get the point that you were being hard on Jon Stwart (the comedian), but you said none of my points were true or relevent to the discussion: (1) Let me get this straight, you support Newt Gingrich ... You basically railed against Jon stewart in support of Newt Gingrich in both your points (2) New Gingrich (a known liar in his own right). He lied about Sonia Sotomayor, Obama being a radical.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more