Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

One minute with George Bush

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
20,430
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 21, 2006

"If you had 1 minute, what would you say to George W. Bush"

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 7 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (scarboz40)

  • Would have loved to hear what he had to say about the "Nader question".

  • OK...The rest of the answer to the Nader question is posted above in Video Responses.

  • chomsky is brilliant as always. could you tell me what lecture this is taken from?

  • Sorry, I'll fix my my descriptions.  It's from "Imperial Grand Strategy" and is a lecture given in the UK at the Universtiy of Manchester, May 2004.

Top Comments

  • Great stuff! Thanks for posting this content.

  • Corporation Monarchy. God save us.

see all

All Comments (18)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • what lecture and Q and A is this from??

  • I agree with what he has to say about the president. I think though the president has to wear too many hats. And has too many things to do. It was interesting that he spoke about Reagan and Bush but not Clinton and Carter during that time. Really all Presidents have so much to do and have to create so much of an image that the president can't really think about policy. There is just too much of it for one person to really be an expert on no matter what adviser can tell him.

  • (for my archives:)

    (1:12) " As long as we have industrial feudalism rather than industrial democracy -- that means tyrannical, totalitarian institutions running the economy... instead of industrial democracy like workers' control and management -- politics will be the shadow cast by business over society. "

    -- John Dewey (1859-1952)

  • LOL

  • Command: I think he was referring to an individual firm, and how management controls workers, instead of workers controlling management.

  • Because it runs from the top down, in a hierarchical way. Economic decisions are made at the top, and the rest are forced to run to catch up. In essence, it's the same as the Soviet system, except that the coercion lies in hunger, and not the truncheon(although that will get used when necessary).

  • great vid and link

  • I assume this is why Chavez loves this guy

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more