John Stossel debates with Bill O'Reilly on the O'Reilly factor on whether we need new laws to protect elected officials. O'Reilly says we need to assign U.S. Marshals to our reps and Stossel says we don't need more laws and expansion of more government security.
@cboncklis oreilly is more pof a political commentator. reporters are supposed to be objective. he's not a reporter. it's his own show, he can talk about what he wants
sming01 7 months ago
we should shoot stossel! or to do a outfoxed "we should kill stossel? but i dotn belive in it but i will still say it"
hansson2000 8 months ago
stossel has his head up his ass.
hansson2000 8 months ago
@driil4will I agree with you. A good journalist should always stand on neutral grounds in general and show objectivity. O'Reilly is a total idiot that should be removed from T.V.... Real poison!!!
cboncklis 9 months ago
once again if you don't agree with o'reilly then you are wrong. i really dislike his portrayal of a news anchor. In fact I laugh at the thought the FOX news is Fair & Balanced
driil4will 1 year ago 2
I don't always agree with Stossel but I must admit he talks an awful lot of sense here. His arguments are intelligent, logical, rock solid, well thought through and based on facts.
HAZIDEAD 1 year ago
Actually, Giffords did have security. Several security details. ex-secret service I believe. And guess what?
They were armed.
Isn't that interesting?
JXZjeremy 1 year ago
i'm convinced that o'reilly would support a fascist state. assassinations rarely happen anymore. there hasn't been a president who has actually come close to being killed since reagan. now he wants to create new laws.
utubeboob420 1 year ago
"Internet driven craziness". That's a laugh.
On the other hand, I heard Hitler invaded Poland after someone stole his cloudsong.
kev3d 1 year ago
Stossel beat Bill on this debate. He's getting more organized and is no longer kicked around by O'Reilly.
chrisconnell 1 year ago