Interisting WTC Simulation

I made a building in SU and Criticly weakend its top floors,as the WTC would have been by athe plane and after affects. Using Sketchypyhsics I simulatd it collapsing. Notice how only the top floors that were originly effected collapse and fall to the ground. The rest of the building sstands ,with obvios structural damage,but no collapse.Why didnt the WTC do this?

The second time,as the building collapsed,I weakend floors in the process of collapse,simulating something inside the building prevoisly,before the Critacal weaking. The entire building crumbles. Ive performed this same test multiple times,and its the same every time. This seems to lean towards something else in the building,and That a plane was mearly a cover up.

now obviosly,what Im doing is far from accurate,with lots of factors not Included,and some magnified.

I honestly dont think 9/11 was an inside job,but Whatever. Overall it was a sad event,and probably the worst day of american history.

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• sketchup
• tower

[ItsBrandonNow]

First of all the twin towers were separate not touching so they didn't have any extra support. Secondly with the real twin towers there was so much force and pressure on the rest of the building and in this you probably have like barely any weight set. And thirdly the structure you have for this building is nothing like the twin towers, the twin towers have a central core structure and a little extra support from the outside walls. So do your studying before you post stupid videos

[carmium]

This vid is so primitive and inaccurate I don't know how anyone has the gall to compare to what happened to the WTC. You should be embarrassed.

[korayek]

@carmium i think the point being made is, in the real world buildings don't collapse with such symmetry, you only get symmetry with a controlled demolition!

[transientdreams]

Lighten up people, he's a teen & he gave it his best shot without facts. 'Research' is an art, a discipline, and requires patience! See this: (9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out, Full-length, Pre-Release-v1.3; Low-Res.) Watch and listen carefully! You will begin to understand better and your 9/11 animation Kung Fu will get stronger in time!

Go the temple and practice!!~

[blahdob]

Why didn't the WTC do this? lol

[Mogtepyigsoloth]

Sept 12, 2001 = (1/2) * (acceleration due to gravity) * [(time)squared] (2005)

Google That.

Watch the archived video and argue with Sir Issac Newton.

[lotsoftrains123]

thi is google sketchup not an animating program but you can pass it off as one i guess

[corruptedsilence]

@ItsBrandonNow It was impossible for the 3 buildings to fall the way they did. It's impossible for 15 floors to destroy 95 floors by falling on top of them. 15 floors will only destroy 15 floors. It's Newton's 3rd law for christ's sakes. Everyone learns this when they're a child. Every action has an equal reaction force. For the building to be as destroyed as it was and to fall at the speed it fell, resistance had to be cut out from below.

[SirRobertDole2]

I had no idea the WTC towers were made of lego. Informative.

[fisheye441]

I cannot comment on that simulation, but the twins are a different issue. The towers were strong enough to actually hold to top coming down n the base easily. It has been calculated multiple times that there simply wasnt enough energy in the system to do nearly free fall and crushing all concrete. These 2 points dont work together. Your either have free fall where nothing is crushed or when things are crushed, not the speed wtc came down. Keep things simple stupid.