Ken Miller on the Scientific Process

Ken Miller, Ph.D, on the scientific process and the idea of "fairness" in science education.

From the series "Listen To The Scientists - Evolution Vs. Creationism".



For the segment in its entirety, see:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNxXlq8_OTA

Kenneth Miller is a Professor of Biology at Brown University.

I recommend his new book: " Only A Theory" : http://tinyurl.com/8oeksz

Visit his websites at:

http://www.millerandlevine.com/km/

http://www.millerandlevine.com/km/evol/

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Kenneth
• Miller
• Listen
• To
• The
• Scientists
• Scientific
• Process
• Science
• Education
• Intelligent
• Design
• Creationism
• Evolution

[MattleSystem]

All the intermediate state from now to your birth, but not picture, not a book, not toys, but real evidence of you.

If you give me a tooth... Come on, are you saying that it is possible to create a man from just one tooth??

You cannot provide evidence,such as fossil record cannot be every second since the beginning visible!

This is a detective story, not just, "Hey I know the murder, I have a personal feeling, I have experienced a day where he was angry..."

[MattleSystem]

@LoricaLady And again you don't explain your theory. the fact that you accept micro evolution in one kind but you don't accept macro evolution...

The thing is in one kind, you have multiple form or even functionality depending on the specie. It does matter if they are both fish or not... it is Evolution.

You have to open a real book and read peer review papers!

You want to see evidence.Where is the missing link that u were a child, I want to see evidence that u were a baby one day!

[LoricaLady]

TO ANYONE: If you see 0 reply to some posters below they know they are on ignore for things like name calling, false accusations of lying, personal insults and sometimes worse.Such people follow me (& others) around YT guard dogging evo-supporting vids with such tactics. If you would like to make any of their same points I would be happy to reply and give what I feel is "the rest of the story." However, I only debate with those who are civil & objective.

[MattleSystem]

@LoricaLady And consequently Einstein recognised his mistake, which is not your case! This is the difference between science and faith, we accept to review our point of view to increase our knowledge. If the given explanation is better and proved to be correct, we accept the theory.

In case of ID, there is no explanation and nothing proved, just assumption and misconception of Evolution process...

[MattleSystem]

Of course Noah's Arch is a stupid story, we all know that by looking at the soil stratigraphy, geophysic and diagraphy and borehole from petroleum industry...

And it is stupid also because of fossils discoveries in a certain order...

But I am really interested to hear your explanation about the origin of all fishes with just mirco evolution and one couple of fish or whatever

[MattleSystem]

@MattleSystem the small fish and the biggest one come all from the ancestor which was a fish... this point, you accept because they are both fish... But do you really think this imply only micro evolution???

No, this is evolution, nothing more, nothing less...

By the way, it would simplify the problem of free space on Noah's Arch, if there was one kind of each animal...one bird, fish, wolf, elephant, ape couple. But the thing is you still need evolution to be totally true.

[MattleSystem]

@LoricaLady You are like all other creationists. you accept micro evolution but not macro evolution, however you claim something that goes against your own theory. Birds stay birds, fishes stay fishes, bees stays bees, spider stay spider...I like this claim, because you consequently accept the fact that a golden fish and a thon are both fish and then they can evolve with just micro evolution..Right? the thing is that between golden fish and thon, it is Evolution.Same with primate!

[LoricaLady]

@recalibration ...and lots of logical fallacies, the faves being Correlation Does Not Imply Causation, Fallacy of the Single Cause & Incomplete Comparison Fallacy. I could tell you a lot more, but I don't debate with those who only cut & paste - don't actually debate - evade responding to all debunks made re the vid, and are neither civil nor objective. You and your insults (here & on my personal channel) are now on block & ignore. BYE!

[LoricaLady]

@recalibration ...stay peas, bees stay peas. 2) There is 0 evidence finch, lizards, sheep etc. etc. have ever been or ever will be anything but finch, lizards, sheep. The fo 3) Mutations & NS have NEVER been shown to give rise to anything more complex than a new species. If you will go through those articles with a fine tooth comb you will invariably find what evo support always depends on "might have...probably....we infer...must have...millions of (untestable & unobservable) years ago..."..

[LoricaLady]

@recalibration ...Here is the line: 1) All changes are the result of evo. 2) So if you see new species, that is evolution. 3) New species (sheep, finches, lizards, whatever) eventually turn into a new genus. For ex. fish don't just stay fish but eventually turn into lizards, birds, mammals etc.4) Mutations & natural selection are the vehicles for the new genus changes. Problems: 1) All changes are LIMITED. As Mendell - who actually used the scientific method, unlike Darwin - said peas...